Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Combustion Characterization and Model Fuel Development for Micro-tubular Flame-assisted Fuel Cells
Published on: October 2, 2016
Development of semi-empirical soot emission model for a CI engine
Youngbok Lee1, Yongjoo Lee1, Sunyoung Moon1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Seoul National University, Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Soot is one of the main harmful emissions of diesel engines that is mainly generated in the reacting fuel jet of diesel injection. Over 99% of the engine-out soot can be filtered by a diesel particulate filter (DPF). However, when the soot load of the DPF is high, a regeneration process that oxidizes the accumulated soot reduces fuel economy. A real-time soot estimation model can contribute to real-time feedback soot control under transient conditions to minimize the engine-out soot emission and frequency of DPF regeneration. A zero-dimensional engine-out soot estimation model for a diesel engine is developed in this study. The semi-empirical soot model considers both the formation and oxidation of soot. In the model, soot formation was correlated with the cross-sectional average equivalence ratio at the lift-off length of the fuel spray. The equivalence ratio at the lift-off length is an indicator of how much air and vaporized fuel are mixed as the fuel reaches the reaction zone. The mass of the injected fuel and combustion duration were also correlated with soot formation. The Nagle and Strickland-Constable mechanism, which calculates the soot oxidation rate was correlated with the soot oxidation in this study. The results of the soot estimation showed an R2 of 0.901 and root mean square error of 10.8 mg/m3 for steady-state experimental cases. The engine-out soot model was also combined with the in-cylinder pressure model proposed by the authors, and validated through the transient Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicles Test Cycle (WLTC) mode. The estimates agreed with the measured soot, with an accumulated soot error of approximately 6% during the WLTC, even without using an in-cylinder pressure sensor. The soot model developed in this study can help minimize tailpipe-out soot emissions and improve fuel economy by influencing the real-time feedback control during transient and frequent DPF regeneration.
More Related Videos
10:04Flame Experiments at the Advanced Light Source: New Insights into Soot Formation Processes
Published on: May 26, 2014
07:24Combustion Chemistry of Fuels: Quantitative Speciation Data Obtained from an Atmospheric High-temperature Flow Reactor with Coupled Molecular-beam Mass Spectrometer
Published on: February 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Otto and Diesel Cycle
Internal Combustion Engine
Combustion Energy: A Measure of Stability in Alkanes and Cycloalkanes
Alkanes undergo combustion in the presence of excess oxygen and high-temperature conditions to give carbon dioxide and water. A combustion reaction is the energy source in natural gas, liquified...
Work Done in an Adiabatic Process
Turnover Number and Catalytic Efficiency
Chymotrypsin is a pancreatic enzyme that breaks down proteins during digestion....
Flame Photometry: Overview