Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

08:20
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
Published on: October 27, 2023
1.8K
Deep Learning Model for the Automatic Classification of White Blood Cells.
Sarang Sharma1, Sheifali Gupta1, Deepali Gupta1
1Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Chandigarh, Punjab, India.
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
|January 24, 2022
Summary
This study introduces a deep learning model for classifying white blood cells (WBCs) from images, achieving high accuracy. The DenseNet121 model offers a faster, less equipment-intensive approach for disease identification.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging Analysis
- Computational Biology
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Background:
- Accurate blood cell counts are crucial for disease diagnosis.
- Traditional methods for blood cell analysis are invasive and equipment-intensive.
- Deep learning offers a promising alternative for automated analysis of blood cell images.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and evaluate a deep learning model for classifying white blood cells (WBCs).
- To optimize the DenseNet121 model using normalization and data augmentation for improved performance.
- To assess the model's effectiveness using various batch sizes and the Adam optimizer.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the DenseNet121 deep learning architecture.
- Applied preprocessing techniques including normalization and data augmentation.
- Trained and simulated the model on a dataset of 12,444 white blood cell images from Kaggle, testing with four batch sizes and the Adam optimizer over 10 epochs.
Main Results:
- Achieved a high classification accuracy of 98.84%.
- Demonstrated excellent performance metrics: 99.33% precision, 98.85% sensitivity, and 99.61% specificity.
- Identified batch size 8 as optimal for the DenseNet121 model's performance in this study.
Conclusions:
- The optimized DenseNet121 model provides a highly accurate and efficient method for WBC classification.
- This deep learning approach reduces the need for sophisticated equipment and time-consuming manual analysis.
- The developed model shows potential for clinical applications in automated WBC detection and disease diagnosis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Leukocytes
3.5K
Leukocytes are classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of cytoplasmic granules. Granular leukocytes, which contain granules, belong to the myeloid lineage and are divided into three subtypes: neutrophils, eosinophils, and basophils. These cells are roughly spherical and characterized by the granules in their cytoplasm.
Neutrophils are the most abundant type of granular leukocytes, comprising 50-70% of all leukocytes. They feature small, evenly distributed granules and a...
Neutrophils are the most abundant type of granular leukocytes, comprising 50-70% of all leukocytes. They feature small, evenly distributed granules and a...
3.5K
Structure and Function of Leukocytes
2.5K
An adult in good health typically has between 4,500 and 11,000 leukocytes, or white blood cells, per microliter of blood, which constitutes about 1% of the total blood volume. Unlike red blood cells, white blood cells contain a nucleus and other cellular organelles but do not have hemoglobin. Most white blood cells reside in connective tissues, particularly in lymphatic organs such as the lymph nodes, with only a small fraction present in circulating blood.
White blood cells protect the body...
White blood cells protect the body...
2.5K
Flow Cytometry
14.2K
The development of flow cytometry techniques began in 1934 with initial attempts by Andrew Moldavan, a bacteriologist who counted the cells in a flowing capillary system. Moldavan pumped cells through a capillary tube focused under a microscope for visualization. The invention of photometry allowed the measurement of differentially-stained cells, and Louis Kamentsky developed the first multiparameter flow cytometer in 1965 to identify and count the cancer cells in cervical tissue specimens.
In...
In...
14.2K

