Sacubitril/valsartan in everyday clinical practice: an observational study based on the experience of a heart failure clinic
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Reduction in Left Ventricular Wall Stress and Improvement in Function in Failing Hearts using Algisyl-LVR
Published on: April 8, 2013
Joana Cabral1,2, Henrique Vasconcelos1,2, Paulo Maia-Araújo2,3,4
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Insights
Sacubitril/valsartan improves heart failure outcomes but faces significant financial and clinical barriers in practice. Patient cost and hypotension limit its use and dose optimization, despite demonstrated benefits in ejection fraction and functional class.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Public Health
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) is a significant and growing public health concern.
- Sacubitril/valsartan is recommended for symptomatic patients with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF <40%), replacing ACEis/ARBs.
- Understanding real-world challenges of sacubitril/valsartan implementation is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the challenges of sacubitril/valsartan use in clinical practice.
- To evaluate prescription rates and reasons for non-prescription.
- To assess tolerability and dose optimization of sacubitril/valsartan.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 152 heart failure patients eligible for sacubitril/valsartan.
- Evaluation of prescription data, reasons for non-prescription, and tolerability to maximal doses.
- Comparison of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and LVEF before and after treatment, with a median follow-up of 41 months.
Main Results:
- Only 49% of eligible patients received sacubitril/valsartan, primarily due to financial barriers (31%) and hypotension (27%).
- Hypotension limited dose optimization, with only 33% reaching maximal dosage.
- Treatment duration correlated with LVEF improvement (6.6% absolute increase/year), and NYHA class improved significantly.
Conclusions:
- Sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated marked improvements in NYHA class and LVEF in clinical practice.
- Significant financial and clinical barriers, including patient cost and hypotension, impede the widespread implementation of sacubitril/valsartan therapy.
- Addressing these barriers is essential for optimizing heart failure management with sacubitril/valsartan.
Background:
Heart failure (HF) is a growing public health problem. Sacubitril/valsartan is now recommended to be used in persistently symptomatic patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, replacing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). In the present study, we aimed to characterise the challenges of sacubitril/valsartan use in everyday clinical practice.
Methods:
We assessed the medical records of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction eligible for sacubitril/valsartan attending a HF clinic at a Portuguese University Hospital during 2018 (n=152). The number of eligible patients receiving the drug and the reasons for not prescribing sacubitril/valsartan were evaluated. Additionally, we assessed the tolerability of maximal doses of sacubitril/valsartan. New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA class) and LVEF before and after up-titration to maximal tolerated sacubitril/valsartan dose were compared. Median follow-up was 41 months.
Results:
Of the 152 included patients, 75 (49%) were prescribed the drug. The two main reasons for non-prescription were patient financial barriers (31%) and hypotension (27%). Only 33% of patients on sacubitril/valsartan did reach maximal dose. Hypotension was the main limiting factor for dose optimisation. Duration of sacubitril/valsartan treatment showed a positive association with LVEF improvement during follow-up (6.6% absolute LVEF increase/year). NYHA functional class improved significantly from baseline through the end of follow-up.
Conclusions:
In every-day clinical practice, although sacubitril/valsartan was associated with a marked improvement in NYHA class and in LVEF, important financial and clinical barriers to the implementation of this therapy were identified.
More Related Videos
03:47Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Direct Renin Inhibitors
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations