Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Application of Real-World Data to External Control Groups in Oncology Clinical Trial Drug Development
Timothy A Yap1, Ira Jacobs2, Elodie Baumfeld Andre2
1Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Abstract:
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assess overall survival are considered the "gold standard" when evaluating the efficacy and safety of a new oncology intervention. However, single-arm trials that use surrogate endpoints (e.g., objective response rate or duration of response) to evaluate clinical benefit have become the basis for accelerated or breakthrough regulatory approval of precision oncology drugs for cases where the target and research populations are relatively small. Interpretation of efficacy in single-arm trials can be challenging because such studies lack a standard-of-care comparator arm. Although an external control group can be based on data from other clinical trials, using an external control group based on data collected outside of a trial may not only offer an alternative to both RCTs and uncontrolled single-arm trials, but it may also help improve decision-making by study sponsors or regulatory authorities. Hence, leveraging real-world data (RWD) to construct external control arms in clinical trials that investigate the efficacy and safety of drug interventions in oncology has become a topic of interest. Herein, we review the benefits and challenges associated with the use of RWD to construct external control groups, and the relevance of RWD to early oncology drug development.
Insights
Real-world data (RWD) offers a promising alternative for constructing external control arms in oncology clinical trials. This approach can enhance decision-making for drug sponsors and regulatory bodies, especially for precision oncology drugs.
Area of Science:
- Oncology Drug Development
- Clinical Trial Design
- Real-World Data (RWD) Applications
Background:
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating oncology interventions, but are resource-intensive.
- Single-arm trials using surrogate endpoints support accelerated approval for precision oncology drugs but lack comparator arms.
- Interpreting efficacy in single-arm trials is challenging due to the absence of a standard-of-care control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the benefits and challenges of using real-world data (RWD) to construct external control arms in oncology clinical trials.
- To explore the relevance of RWD in early-stage oncology drug development.
- To provide insights for improving decision-making by study sponsors and regulatory authorities.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and methodologies for constructing external control arms using real-world data.
- Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of RWD-based external control arms compared to traditional trial designs.
- Exploration of RWD's role in supporting regulatory submissions and early-phase oncology research.
Main Results:
- Leveraging RWD for external control arms can provide a valuable alternative to RCTs and uncontrolled single-arm trials.
- RWD can potentially improve the efficiency and informativeness of oncology clinical trials, particularly for rare or specific patient populations.
- Challenges include data quality, standardization, and methodological considerations for robust RWD utilization.
Conclusions:
- Real-world data presents a significant opportunity to enhance oncology clinical trial design and drug development.
- The strategic use of RWD for external control arms can aid in evaluating drug efficacy and safety, supporting regulatory decisions.
- Further research and methodological development are needed to optimize the application of RWD in oncology research.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Controls in Experiments
Data Collection by Experiments
An example of the experimental method is a public...
Cancer Survival Analysis

