Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Optimal Revascularization Strategy for Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel
Kongyong Cui1,2,3,4, Dong Yin1,2,3,4, Chenggang Zhu1,2,3,4
1Cardiometabolic Medicine Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Insights
Immediate or staged complete revascularization significantly reduces cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (MI) compared to culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI patients. Immediate revascularization shows the highest probability of being the best strategy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Optimal revascularization strategy for hemodynamically stable ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease is debated.
- Comparing immediate complete revascularization, staged complete revascularization, and culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Approach:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted.
- Eleven trials involving 6,942 patients were analyzed using random-effects models for pairwise and network meta-analyses.
- The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality or myocardial infarction (MI).
Key Points:
- Both immediate and staged complete revascularization significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or MI compared to culprit-only PCI.
- Immediate complete revascularization was associated with a 52% risk reduction (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.73).
- Staged complete revascularization showed a 27% risk reduction (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.88).
Conclusions:
- Complete revascularization, whether immediate or staged, offers significant benefits over culprit-only PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease.
- Immediate complete revascularization demonstrated the highest probability (77%) of being the optimal strategy.
- Further research is needed to directly compare immediate versus staged complete revascularization strategies.
Abstract:
Background: The relative benefit of immediate complete revascularization, staged complete revascularization, and culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear in hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of the 3 PCI strategies in this population. Methods: We followed a pre-specified protocol (PROSPERO number: CRD42020183801). A comprehensive search of the electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library from inception through February 21, 2020 was conducted. Randomized trials evaluating the comparative efficacy and safety of at least 2 of the 3 PCI strategies were identified. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular mortality or myocardial infarction (MI) during the longest follow-up. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed with random-effects model. Results: Eleven trials including 6,942 patients were analyzed. Pairwise meta-analysis noted that immediate complete revascularization and staged complete revascularization were respectively associated with a 52 and 27% reduction in the risk of cardiovascular death or MI (relative risk [RR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.73, I2 = 0%; and RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.88, I2 = 0%, respectively), compared with culprit-only PCI. The risk of cardiovascular death or MI was not statistically different in staged and immediate complete revascularization groups (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.45-1.72, I2 = 0%). Network meta-analysis obtained almost similar results compared with pairwise meta-analysis, and immediate complete revascularization had a 77% probability of being the best strategy for reducing cardiovascular death or MI among the 3 PCI strategies. Conclusion: The current evidence suggests that both immediate and staged complete revascularization were associated with a reduction of cardiovascular death or MI compared with culprit-only PCI. Further trials are warranted to directly compare immediate vs. staged complete revascularization in this population. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, PROSPERO [CRD42020183801].
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina IV: Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management