Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

A Pre-Clinical Porcine Model of Orthotopic Heart Transplantation
Published on: April 27, 2019
Has the profile of heart transplantation recipients changed within the last three decades?
Zurbuchen Anouck1, Piergiorgio Tozzi2, Julien Regamey1
1Cardiology, Cardiovascular Department, University Hospital Lausanne, Switzerland.
Insights
Advances in heart failure therapy did not alter the profile of heart transplant candidates. However, post-transplant survival improved, indicating better outcomes for heart transplantation recipients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Heart transplantation is the primary treatment for end-stage heart failure.
- Heart failure therapies have advanced significantly, improving patient survival and symptoms.
- The impact of these advancements on heart transplant candidate profiles and post-transplant survival remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate changes in heart transplant candidate characteristics over time.
- To assess the effect of evolving heart failure treatments on post-transplant survival.
- To determine if current listing criteria remain appropriate for identifying suitable candidates.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 323 heart transplant recipients from 1987-2018.
- Patients were grouped into three periods based on heart failure therapy availability.
- Data analyzed included patient demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and pre-transplant parameters.
Main Results:
- Patient demographics and pre-transplant characteristics showed no significant differences across the three periods.
- The prevalence of ischemic cardiomyopathy decreased, while dilated cardiomyopathy increased in period 2.
- Post-transplant 1-year survival was highest in the most recent period (2011-2018).
Conclusions:
- Despite advances in medical heart failure treatment, the profile of heart transplant candidates has not significantly changed.
- Current listing criteria effectively identify end-stage heart failure patients with consistent profiles.
- Improved 1-year post-transplant survival in the latest period suggests better outcomes, possibly due to evolving therapies and management.
Background:
Heart transplantation remains the most durable treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure refractory to medical treatment. Central elements of the listing criteria for heart transplantation have remained largely unchanged in the last three decades whereas treatment of heart failure has significantly increased survival and reduced disease-related symptoms. It remains unknown whether the improvement of heart failure therapy changed the profile of heart transplantation candidates or affected post-transplant survival.
Methods:
The study investigated a total of 323 heart transplant recipients of the Lausanne University Hospital with 328 transplant operations between 1987 and 2018. Patients were separated into three groups on the basis of availability of heart failure therapy: period 1 (1987-1998; n = 115) when renin-angiotensin system blockade and diuretic treatment were available; period 2 (1999-2010; n = 106) marked by the addition of beta-blocker and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist treatment in severe heart failure, and the establishment of cardiac defibrillator and resynchronisation therapy; period 3 (2011-2018; n = 107) characterised by the increasing use of ventricular assist devices for bridge to transplantation.
Results:
The patient characteristics age (all: 53.4 years), male sex (all: 79%) and body mass index (all: 24.5 kg/m2) did not differ between periods. History of arterial hypertension was less prevalent in period 2 (period 1 vs 2 vs 3: 44 vs 28 vs 43%, p = 0.04) whereas other cardiovascular risk factors were equally distributed. Left ventricular ejection fraction, VO2max, and pulmonary vascular resistance were not different between the three periods. The prevalence of ischaemic cardiomyopathy was higher in periods 1 and 3; dilated non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy was more frequent in period 2. Post-transplant 1-year survival was highest in period 3 (1 vs 2 vs 3: 87.2 ± 3.2% vs 70.8 ± 4.4% vs 93.0 ± 2.6%, p always ≤0.02), and the Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivors of the first year post-transplant were not different between the three periods. In descriptive analysis, early mortality was not associated with acknowledged pretransplant predictors of post-transplant mortality.
Conclusion:
Availability of different medical heart failure treatments did not result in greatly different pretransplant characteristics of heart transplantation recipients across the three periods. This suggests that the maintained central criteria of listing for heart transplantation still identify end-stage heart failure patients with a similar profile. This finding can explain the unchanged overall mortality on condition of 1-year survival across the three periods, since pretransplant characteristics are relevant for long-term survival after heart transplantation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...

