Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
Published on: December 15, 2010
Configurational entropy of a finite number of dumbbells close to a wall
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polymer Technology, Eindhoven University of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600, MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. m.huetter@tue.nl.
Abstract:
The effect of confinement on the conformation of N dumbbells in D dimensions close to a non-interacting and rigid flat wall is examined. Using statistical mechanics and numerical calculations, the partition coefficient and the confinement-induced change in the configurational entropy are calculated as a function of the conformation tensor [Formula: see text] and of the distance of the dumbbells from the wall. Analytical predictions and numerical results for [Formula: see text] concerning the behavior close to the limiting cases (onset of and saturation of confinement) agree favorably; in one case where an analytical prediction has not been achieved, a thorough numerical study establishes the limiting behavior nevertheless. Beyond these limiting cases, the overall behavior of the partition coefficient and the configurational entropy has been examined as well in detail, for various choices of the parameters. Furthermore, it is shown that the effect of confinement for [Formula: see text] is captured entirely by the partition coefficient determined for [Formula: see text]. In general, the average extension of the dumbbells in the direction perpendicular to the wall is decreased the closer the dumbbells are to the wall. Also, the decay of the partition coefficient with increasing extension of the dumbbells becomes steeper, i.e., more localized, the higher the number of dumbbells N. Finally, it is discussed under what conditions these results can be used also for the case of slab- (i.e., slit-) confinement.
Related Concept Videos
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
Stability of Equilibrium Configuration: Problem Solving
Problem-solving in the context of the stability of equilibrium configuration...
Method of Joints: Problem Solving II
Entropy
Third Law of Thermodynamics
First Law: Particles in Two-dimensional Equilibrium
Newton's first law tells us about...

