Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Convenience Sampling Method00:55

Convenience Sampling Method

9.9K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
9.9K
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

13.2K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
13.2K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

11.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
11.3K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

13.0K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
13.0K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

12.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
12.7K
Bootstrapping01:24

Bootstrapping

681
The term "bootstrap" originated in the 19th century as a metaphor for self-improvement or achieving something independently, without external assistance. This concept extends to statistical bootstrapping, a self-contained method for estimating population parameters through resampling, even though it can be computationally intensive. Developed by the American statistician Dr. Bradley Efron in 1979, bootstrapping provides a robust way to perform inference when the original sample size is...
681

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

FoMo: A unifying theory of visual foraging.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Measuring visual discomfort - a novel two-step method for reducing criterion effects when measuring subjective responses.

Vision research·2026
Same author

Recent breeding experience improves egg ejection behaviour.

Biology letters·2026
Same author

A machine learning approach to facilitate parasitic egg identification in a conspecific brood parasite.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Designing a test battery for real-world visual search.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Visual search efficiency is modulated by symmetry type and texture regularity.

Journal of vision·2025
Same journal

Another 10 years of PLOS Computational Biology: A data-driven reflection on trends in genomics research.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Mobility data resolution needed to inform predictive models of spatial epidemic spread from mobile phone data.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

DeepMethylation: A deep learning framework for tissue-specific DNA methylation prediction and functional variant annotation.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Redefining and estimating the early-phase reproduction ratio for epidemic outbreaks in spatially structured populations.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Optimized phenotype definitions boost GWAS power.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Detection, communication, and individual identification with deep audio embeddings: A case study with North Atlantic right whales.

PLoS computational biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 5, 2025

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods
08:20

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

Published on: October 20, 2019

6.0K

Foraging as sampling without replacement: A Bayesian statistical model for estimating biases in target selection.

Alasdair D F Clarke1, Amelia R Hunt2, Anna E Hughes1

  • 1University of Essex, Department of Psychology, Colchester, United Kingdom.

Plos Computational Biology
|January 24, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans often search for similar items in sequences, a tendency that is hard to measure precisely. This study introduces a new Bayesian model to better analyze foraging behavior and biases, offering deeper insights into visual search strategies.

More Related Videos

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.6K
Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 5, 2025

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods
08:20

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

Published on: October 20, 2019

6.0K
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
07:41

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

7.6K
Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Ecology

Background:

  • Foraging behavior in humans and animals often involves searching for multiple targets sequentially.
  • A common observation is the tendency to forage in 'runs' of the same target type, particularly when targets are difficult to distinguish from distractors.
  • Existing measures like run statistics are limited as they are interdependent and constrained by target distribution, hindering analysis of cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address limitations in current measures of foraging behavior.
  • To develop a novel modeling approach for analyzing target selection biases in human foraging.
  • To facilitate direct comparison of foraging tendencies across different search environments.

Main Methods:

  • Modeled foraging as a generative sampling without replacement procedure.
  • Implemented this approach using a Bayesian multilevel model.
  • Broke down foraging behavior into specific biases, including target proximity and run-selection bias, independent of target quantity.

Main Results:

  • The developed model allows for the quantification of specific foraging biases.
  • This approach is not dependent on the number or distribution of targets present in the search environment.
  • The model facilitates direct comparisons of foraging tendencies across environments with varying characteristics.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed Bayesian multilevel model offers a more precise and flexible method for analyzing human foraging behavior.
  • This approach overcomes limitations of traditional run statistics, providing deeper insights into underlying cognitive processes.
  • The model serves as a foundation for future research in visual foraging and decision-making.