Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2026

A Battery of Motor Tests in a Neonatal Mouse Model of Cerebral Palsy
Published on: November 3, 2016
Early detection of cerebral palsy: sensitivity and specificity of two motor assessment tools
1Physical Therapy Department, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
Insights
The Movement Assessment of Infants (MAI) is more sensitive for early cerebral palsy detection than the Bayley Motor Scale, but the Bayley Scale yields fewer false positives. Both tools are crucial for NICU follow-up assessments.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal neurology
- Pediatric developmental assessment
Background:
- Early detection of cerebral palsy (CP) is critical in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) follow-up.
- Neuromotor assessment tools are vital for identifying infants with CP.
Purpose of the Study:
- To retrospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Bayley Motor Scale and the Movement Assessment of Infants (MAI).
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy of these tools in identifying cerebral palsy at four months' corrected age.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of neuromotor assessment data.
- Calculation of sensitivity and specificity for Bayley Motor Scale and MAI.
- Comparison with previously published data on other neurological assessment tools.
Main Results:
- The Movement Assessment of Infants (MAI) demonstrated over twice the sensitivity of the Bayley Motor Scale in detecting early cerebral palsy signs.
- The Bayley Motor Scale exhibited a lower rate of false positives compared to the MAI.
- Comparative analysis of sensitivity and specificity was performed against existing literature.
Conclusions:
- The MAI is a more sensitive tool for early cerebral palsy detection in infants.
- The Bayley Motor Scale offers higher specificity, reducing false positive diagnoses.
- Both tools play distinct roles in the comprehensive neuromotor assessment of high-risk infants.
Abstract:
The early detection of cerebral palsy is an important goal of NICU follow-up clinics, and a variety of different neuromotor assessment tools are used to assess its presence. This study aimed to examine retrospectively the sensitivity and specificity of the Bayley Motor Scale and the Movement Assessment of Infants (MAI) in correctly identifying infants at four months' corrected age as either "normal" or "suspect/abnormal." The MAI was more than twice as sensitive as the Bayley Motor Scale at detecting early signs of cerebral palsy. However, the Bayley Motor Scale had fewer "false positives" for cerebral palsy than the MAI. Sensitivity and specificity for these two instruments were compared to those of other neurological assessment tools in previously published studies.

