Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
The novel left atrial strain parameters in diagnosing of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Chang-Sheng Ma1, Yu-Ping Liao1, Jia-Li Fan1
1Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Ave, Suzhou, China.
Insights
Novel left atrial strain parameters accurately identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and estimate left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). These advanced echocardiographic measures offer improved diagnostic efficiency for HFpEF compared to existing methods.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) diagnosis remains challenging.
- Accurate estimation of left ventricular end-diast diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is crucial for HFpEF assessment.
- Novel echocardiographic parameters may improve diagnostic capabilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate novel left atrial (LA) strain parameters for discriminating HFpEF patients from those at risk.
- To assess the ability of LA strain parameters to estimate LVEDP.
- To compare the diagnostic performance of novel LA parameters with existing criteria.
Main Methods:
- Prospective enrollment of 389 patients with HFpEF risk factors.
- Measurement of left atrial reservoir strain (LASr), LA filling index, and LA stiffness index.
- Comparison with invasive LVEDP measurements and conventional echocardiographic algorithms (ASE/SCAI).
- Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine diagnostic accuracy.
Main Results:
- Novel LA strain parameters (LASr, LA filling index, LA stiffness index, LAVI/LASr) showed good diagnostic accuracy for elevated LVEDP (AUC .755 to .843).
- LA strain parameters demonstrated good agreement with invasive LVEDP measurements, outperforming 2016 ASE/SCAI algorithms (kappa .711 vs. .101).
- LA stiffness index achieved the highest accuracy (AUC .821) in discriminating HFpEF from at-risk individuals.
Conclusions:
- Novel LA strain parameters are useful for estimating LVEDP.
- Incorporating these parameters into diagnostic criteria could enhance HFpEF diagnostic efficiency.
- These novel parameters accurately discriminate HFpEF, showing non-inferior performance to conventional echocardiographic methods.
Objectives:
We sought to evaluate the ability of the novel LA strain parameters to discriminate patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) from individuals with risk factors of HFpEF.
Methods And Results:
A total of n = 389 patients with risk factors for HFpEF finally was prospectively enrolled into the study, 66 of them were diagnosed with HFpEF by the 2021 ESC HF guidelines. Fifty-five patients were undergone left ventricular catheterization and simultaneous transthoracic echocardiography was performed, 35 of them with elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). Left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) was measured in all patients. LA filling index was defined as the ratio of mitral E and LASr and LA stiffness index was calculated as E/e'/LASr. Compared with the patients in the normal LVEDP subgroup, those in the elevated LVEDP subgroup showed significantly higher LA filling index, LA stiffness index, and LAVI/LASr. The receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis showed LASr (area under curve [AUC] .840), LA filling index (AUC .843), LA stiffness index (AUC .766), and LAVI/LASr (AUC .755) had good diagnostic accuracy for elevated LVEDP. Inter-technique agreement analysis showed the novel algorithms with LA strain parameters had good agreement with the invasive LVEDP measurement, better than the 2016 ASE/SCAI algorithms (kappa .711 vs. .101). Furthermore, compared with patients without HFpEF, LASr was lower in HFpEF, LA filling index, LA stiffness index, and LAVI/LASr was higher in patients with HFpEF. ROC analysis showed the novel LA strain parameters with good accuracy (AUC .756 to .821) non-inferior to conventional echocardiographic parameters could identify HFpEF, and LA stiffness index (AUC .821) was the best one.
Conclusion:
The novel LA strain parameters could be of potential usefulness in estimating LVEDP and incorporated into the 2016 EACVI/ASE criteria would improve the diagnostic efficiency. The novel LA strain parameters with good accuracy non-inferior to conventional echocardiographic parameters could discriminate HFpEF from patients with risk factors of HFpEF.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

