Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis
Published on: April 12, 2024
Follicular and Hurthle Cell Carcinoma: Comparison of Clinicopathological Features and Clinical Outcomes
Danielli Matsuura1, Avery Yuan1, Laura Wang1
1Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract:
Follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) and Hurthle cell carcinoma (HCC) are rare and aggressive thyroid cancers with limited published data comparing their outcomes or regarding their subtypes. The aim of this study was to describe clinicopathological features and compare clinical outcomes of patients with FTC and HCC based on the 2017 World Health Organization definition and extent of vascular invasion (VI). We retrospectively studied 190 patients with HCC and FTC primarily treated with surgery at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 1986 and 2015. Patients were classified as minimally invasive (MI), encapsulated angioinvasive with focal VI (EA-FVI), encapsulated angioinvasive with extensive VI (EA-EVI), and as widely invasive (WI). To compare clinical outcomes, patients were grouped as follows: group 1 = FTC-MI and FTC EA-FVI, group 2 = FTC EA-EVI and FTC-WI, group 3 = HCC-MI and HCC EA-FVI, group 4 = HCC EA-EVI and HCC-WI. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS). Outcomes were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test. Patients with HCC (n = 111) were more likely to be older than 55 years old (59% vs. 27%, p < 0.001) with a tendency to present with more extensive VI (33% vs. 19%, p = 0.07) compared with FTC (n = 79). Comparing groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, group 4 patients were more likely to recur (DFS 98%, 93%, 98% vs. 73%, respectively, p = 0.0069). There was no statistically significant difference in OS, DSS LRRFS, or DRFS. Stratified by extent of VI (no, focal, and extensive VI), patients with extensive VI were more likely to recur (RFS 100%, 95%, 77%, p = 0.0025) and had poorer distant control (DRFS: 100%, 95%, 80%, p = 0.022), compared with patients absent or focal VI. Accurate assessment of the extent of VI and tumor phenotype (follicular vs. Hurthle) are essential in identifying patients at higher risk of recurrence.
More Related Videos
07:43Four-color Fluorescence Immunohistochemistry of T-cell Subpopulations in Archival Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Human Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Samples
Published on: July 29, 2017
11:28Isolation and Characterization of a Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Subpopulation Having Stem Cell Characteristics
Published on: May 11, 2016