Lessons learned from research on choroideremia

Having devoted over 35 years of my professional life to various projects on choroideremia (CHM), I began to reflect on the many lessons that I learned along the way. One of the most important is: we should pay careful attention to possible, unintended psychological harm in clinical research. This lesson was learned early and then reinforced when I engaged CHM patients in an investigator-sponsored Phase IB clinical trial of ocular gene therapy for choroideremia. My second lesson came from the trial itself in that preliminary data may not be sufficient to predict the risks to patients in a clinical trial. In the significant push to begin a gene therapy trial for CHM patients, writing grants, recruiting personnel, interacting with regulatory authorities, acquiring research equipment to test outcome measures, I missed a third lesson. There is significant bias when the principal investigator of an investigator-sponsored clinical trial is also the treating physician in the trial. Ideally, those two roles should be kept separate. Finally, having completed the clinical trial, I learned that gene replacement with an AAV vector may not be the only genetic therapy for CHM; an antisense oligonucleotide therapy may be possible in select cases.