Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025
Fluorescence Molecular Tomography for In Vivo Imaging of Glioblastoma Xenografts
Published on: April 26, 2018
[Comparative analysis of 5-ALA and chlorin E6 fluorescence-guided navigation in malignant glioma surgery]
A Yu Rynda1, V E Olyushin1, D M Rostovtsev1
1Polenov Russian Neurosurgery Institute of the Branch of the Almazov National Medical Research Center, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Objective:
To analyze specificity and sensitivity of 5-ALA and chlorin E6 fluorescence-guided navigation in malignant glioma surgery.
Material And Methods:
Fluorescence-guided navigation was analyzed in 50 patients (2 groups) with high-grade glioma. All patients were treated at the Polenov Russian Neurosurgery Institute. Chlorin E6 1 mg/kg intravenously (Photoditazin) was used as a fluorescence inducer in 25 patients (the 1st group), 5-ALA 20 mg/kg orally (Alasens) - in other 25 patients (the 2nd group). Each group included 10 patients with glioma grade III and 15 patients with glioma grade IV. Both groups were statistically representative (p>0.05).
Results:
In patients with glioma grade III, sensitivity of chlorin E6 fluorescence-guided navigation was 83.8%, 5-ALA fluorescence - 82.5%. Specificity was 66.7% and 64.1%, respectively. In patients with glioma grade IV, sensitivity was 87.7% for chlorin E6 and 88.3% for 5-ALA. Specificity was 85.2% and 88.1%, respectively.
Conclusion:
Statistical analysis confirmed comparable high efficacy of both agents in surgery of malignant gliomas. Sensitivity and specificity of fluorescence-guided navigation with chlorin E6 and 5-ALA were similar (p>0.05).
More Related Videos
12:24Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
Published on: July 17, 2012
11:09Establishing Intracranial Brain Tumor Xenografts With Subsequent Analysis of Tumor Growth and Response to Therapy using Bioluminescence Imaging
Published on: July 13, 2010