Can magnetically controlled growing rods be successfully salvaged after deep surgical site infection?

Krishna V Suresh1, Majd Marrache1, Jaime Gomez2

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University Hospital, 601 North Caroline Street, JHOC 5230, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.

Spine Deformity
|January 27, 2022
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Retained Mehta-Cobb Spinal Instrumentation (MCGR) showed similar recurrent deep wound infection rates compared to removal and exchange after initial deep surgical site infections (SSI). Salvaging MCGR is a viable option with comparable outcomes to revision surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Spine Surgery
  • Infectious Disease
  • Orthopedic Implants

Background:

  • Deep surgical site infections (SSI) following spinal instrumentation pose a significant challenge.
  • Management options include implant retention (salvage) or removal and exchange.
  • Recurrent infection rates and outcomes for retained versus revised implants require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the rate of recurrent deep wound infection in patients who retained Mehta-Cobb Spinal Instrumentation (MCGR) versus those who underwent implant removal and exchange.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of salvaging MCGR following an index deep wound infection.

Main Methods:

  • A multicenter registry identified patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) who underwent surgical correction with MCGR.
  • Deep SSI was defined as infection requiring incision and drainage (I&D) and antibiotic therapy.
  • Recurrent infection was defined as an additional deep SSI after treatment of the index infection. MCGR salvage was defined as no removal/exchange for at least one year post-infection.

Main Results:

  • Of 992 EOS patients, 33 (3.3%) developed deep SSI.
  • MCGR was salvaged in 69-100% of patients across different EOS etiologies.
  • There were only four recurrent infections, with no significant difference in recurrent infection rates between salvaged and replaced/exchanged MCGR (p=0.97).

Conclusions:

  • Deep wound infection occurred in 3% of MCGR patients, with a mean time to infection of 13.1 months.
  • Salvaging MCGR is associated with similar rates of recurrent infection compared to implant removal and exchange.
  • These findings suggest that retaining MCGR is a safe and effective management strategy following deep surgical site infections.

Related Concept Videos