Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HIV and Syphilis Testing Among Patients Tested for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia in Emergency Departments.

The western journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Missed Opportunities for HIV and Syphilis Co-Testing in Emergency Departments.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2026
Same author

Segmentally repeated ventral nerve cord circuits drive different leg rubbing behaviors in <i>Drosophila</i> grooming.

iScience·2026
Same author

Inhibitory circuits control leg movements during <i>Drosophila</i> grooming.

eLife·2026
Same author

Behavior choices amongst grooming, feeding and courting in Drosophila show contextual flexibility, not an absolute hierarchy of needs.

The Journal of experimental biology·2025
Same author

Deep Learning Classification of Prostate Cancer Using MRI Histopathologic Data.

Radiology. Imaging cancer·2025
Same journal

Assessing circuit function in the developing <i>Xenopus</i> tadpole: a survey of the behavioral toolkit and underlying neural substrates.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Dawn of the dread: threatening cinematic virtual reality environments enhance general but not specific pavlovian-instrumental transfer.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Transcranial alternating current stimulation improves cognitive functions in healthy subjects through modifying frontoparietal and dorsal attention networks based on personalized individual theta frequency analysis.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Functional loss of PKMζ in the dorsal hippocampus potentiates the time-dependent increase in false contextual fear memory and impairs spatial recognition memory in mice.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Distinct orbitofrontal circuits with dorsal and ventral CA1 differentially regulate spatial memory and emotional behaviors.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Towards a neurophysiological model of kundalini: a theoretical framework informed by preliminary clinical observations.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Quantification of Drosophila Grooming Behavior
09:18

Quantification of Drosophila Grooming Behavior

Published on: July 19, 2017

9.4K

Variation and Variability in Drosophila Grooming Behavior.

Joshua M Mueller1,2, Neil Zhang3, Jean M Carlson2

  • 1Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Dynamical Neuroscience, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States.

Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
|January 28, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Genetic differences drive species-specific grooming behaviors in Drosophila, but genetic diversity within a species does not increase grooming variability. Sequence variability appears inherent to the grooming behavior itself.

Keywords:
Drosophilabehaviormotor sequenceneural circuitsvariabilityvariation

More Related Videos

Quantification of Drosophila melanogaster Grooming Behavior for Evaluation of Excessive Grooming Phenotypes
05:08

Quantification of Drosophila melanogaster Grooming Behavior for Evaluation of Excessive Grooming Phenotypes

Published on: March 21, 2025

768
Drosophila Passive Avoidance Behavior as a New Paradigm to Study Associative Aversive Learning
06:20

Drosophila Passive Avoidance Behavior as a New Paradigm to Study Associative Aversive Learning

Published on: October 15, 2021

3.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Quantification of Drosophila Grooming Behavior
09:18

Quantification of Drosophila Grooming Behavior

Published on: July 19, 2017

9.4K
Quantification of Drosophila melanogaster Grooming Behavior for Evaluation of Excessive Grooming Phenotypes
05:08

Quantification of Drosophila melanogaster Grooming Behavior for Evaluation of Excessive Grooming Phenotypes

Published on: March 21, 2025

768
Drosophila Passive Avoidance Behavior as a New Paradigm to Study Associative Aversive Learning
06:20

Drosophila Passive Avoidance Behavior as a New Paradigm to Study Associative Aversive Learning

Published on: October 15, 2021

3.9K

Area of Science:

  • Ethology
  • Behavioral Genetics
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Grooming behavior in Drosophila provides survival and social advantages.
  • Behavioral differences can arise from species variation or individual variability within a population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of genetic differences in causing variation and variability in Drosophila grooming.
  • To determine if genetic diversity within a species correlates with grooming variability.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of grooming behavior across five Drosophila species exposed to a dust irritant.
  • Experimental manipulation of genetic heterogeneity in Drosophila melanogaster.
  • Standardization of sensory input using optogenetics.

Main Results:

  • Significant interspecies differences were observed in activity levels, cleaning movement proportions, and grooming syntax.
  • Intraspecific grooming sequence variability was present and not correlated with genetic diversity.
  • Optogenetic standardization of sensory input reduced but did not eliminate grooming sequence variability.

Conclusions:

  • Large genetic differences lead to distinct grooming phenotypes (variation).
  • Genetic heterogeneity within a population does not necessarily increase the range of grooming behavior (variability).
  • Grooming sequence variability may be an intrinsic feature of the behavior itself.