Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatiotemporal dynamics of renal distal convoluted tubule dilatation and cyst formation in nephronophthisis type 1 mice.

Renal failure·2026
Same author

Distinct rhizosphere microbiomes and metabolomes mediate Fusarium crown rot resistance across wheat cultivars.

NPJ biofilms and microbiomes·2026
Same author

Domain-aware domain-class adaptation network for motor execution to motor imagery EEG classification.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same author

Noise-Driven Feature Enhancement of High-Frequency SSVEP Through Underdamped Second-Order Stochastic Resonance Energy Transfer.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

SCGait a novel method for person identification applied to legged robots.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Differential neural responses to rhythmic motion and rhythmic static auditory stimuli: An EEG and fNIRS study.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Relationship between spontaneous EEG oscillations at 7 and 45 days of acute plateau exposure and the plateau acclimatization index.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Neuroprotective effects of paederoside against mitochondrial dysfunction in rotenone-induced cell models of Parkinson's disease.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Covariance-based analysis of spindle-band EEG during declarative and non-declarative odor cueing in sleep.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Correction: Physiological determinants of cortical P100 responses in pattern visual evoked potentials: a scoping review.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor overflow: a systematic review in neurological disorders.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Editorial: Advancing neurodegenerative disease biomarkers: the role of neuroimaging in TDP-43 and tau proteinopathies.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.5K

Does Oblique Effect Affect SSVEP-Based Visual Acuity Assessment?

Xiaowei Zheng1, Guanghua Xu1,2, Yuhui Du1

  • 1School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|January 31, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) visual acuity assessment is not significantly affected by stimulus orientation or the oblique effect. Various visual stimuli demonstrate consistent performance in evaluating visual acuity using SSVEPs.

Keywords:
oblique effectspatial frequencysteady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)stimulus orientationvisual acuity

More Related Videos

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

2.8K
Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials
12:11

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Published on: April 27, 2021

3.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.5K
Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

2.8K
Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials
12:11

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Published on: April 27, 2021

3.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Vision Science
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • The oblique effect, a phenomenon where visual acuity differs for horizontal/vertical versus oblique orientations, may influence visual assessment.
  • Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) offer an objective method for visual acuity assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of stimulus orientation and the oblique effect on SSVEP-based visual acuity assessment.
  • To evaluate the performance of various visual stimuli in eliciting reliable SSVEP responses for visual acuity measurement.

Main Methods:

  • SSVEPs were elicited using seven distinct visual stimuli, including gratings, checkerboards, and concentric rings, at varying spatial frequencies.
  • Stimuli were presented in horizontal, vertical, and oblique orientations.
  • A threshold estimation criterion was applied to determine objective SSVEP visual acuity.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were found in SSVEP amplitude or signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for gratings or checkerboards across different orientations.
  • SSVEP visual acuity measurements were consistent across all seven visual stimuli.
  • The oblique effect and stimulus orientation showed minimal impact on SSVEP responses and visual acuity outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • All seven tested visual stimuli perform comparably well for SSVEP-based visual acuity assessment.
  • Stimulus orientation and the oblique effect do not significantly alter SSVEP responses or the resulting visual acuity measurements.