Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

07:53
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Published on: August 5, 2022
2.2K
Helping as a Concurrent Activity: How Students Engage in Small Groups While Pursuing Classroom Tasks.
1Department of German Studies, School of Humanities and Cultural Studies, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Frontiers in Psychology
|January 31, 2022
Summary
Students navigate complex classroom helping interactions, balancing learning with social and moral commitments. This study analyzes how group dynamics and problem definition shape collaborative learning environments.
Area of Science:
- Education
- Sociolinguistics
- Conversation Analysis
Background:
- Previous research on student helping focused on learning outcomes and social dynamics.
- This study addresses the under-researched area of moral commitments in concurrent helping activities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze how students manage dual involvements in classroom activities and helping interactions.
- To investigate the constitution, maintenance, and dissolution of student groups during helping.
- To demonstrate the application of multimodal interaction analysis to naturally occurring helping groups.
Main Methods:
- Conversation analytic perspective applied to video recordings of classroom interactions.
- Multimodal interaction analysis of student groups in mathematics and German lessons.
- Focus on sequential organization and bodily-spatial arrangements of helping.
Main Results:
- Helping interactions are jointly accomplished and sequentially organized.
- Compatibility of helping with ongoing activities and problem definition influence group arrangements.
- Student groups exhibit a continuum from shared helping space to individual/collective space orientation.
Conclusions:
- Students face multifaceted interactional and moral challenges in concurrent helping activities.
- The study highlights the dynamic nature of group formation and interaction in collaborative learning.
- Multimodal interaction analysis is effective for studying real-world student helping behaviors.
Related Concept Videos
Social Loafing
36.5K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
36.5K
Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group
13.9K
Interpersonal communication focuses on the exchange of messages between two people.
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, and mediated communication. We engage in verbal communication when we use words during our interaction to convey specific meanings. On the other hand, nonverbal communication refers to various factors that can impact how we understand each other—for example, facial expressions.
We interact with others using mediated technologies like the...
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, and mediated communication. We engage in verbal communication when we use words during our interaction to convey specific meanings. On the other hand, nonverbal communication refers to various factors that can impact how we understand each other—for example, facial expressions.
We interact with others using mediated technologies like the...
13.9K
Social Facilitation
33.5K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
33.5K
Group Design
9.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.8K
Impact of Individuals on a Group
30
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
30
Persuasion Strategies
40.4K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
40.4K

