Maldeployment of Celt ACD vascular closure device

Benjamin Hart1, Sachinder Singh Hans1

  • 1Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Macomb Hospital, Clinton Township, Mich.

Insights

Vascular closure devices offer benefits like faster healing, but errors in deployment can lead to serious complications. This study highlights two cases of Celt arterial closure device maldeployment causing significant patient harm.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular surgery
  • Medical device technology
  • Patient safety

Background:

  • Vascular closure devices (VCDs) are increasingly used for arterial access site closure.
  • They offer advantages such as expedited hemostasis and earlier patient ambulation compared to manual compression.
  • Despite benefits, VCDs carry risks if not deployed correctly.

Observation:

  • Two distinct cases involving the Celt arterial closure device are presented.
  • In both instances, the device was maldeployed, indicating a failure in the intended application process.
  • The maldeployment directly correlated with adverse patient outcomes.

Findings:

  • Maldeployment of the Celt arterial closure device can lead to significant patient morbidity.
  • Specific complications arising from maldeployment were observed, underscoring the device-specific risks.
  • These cases illustrate potential failure modes in VCD technology.

Implications:

  • Clinicians must exercise caution and adhere strictly to deployment protocols for vascular closure devices.
  • Further research into VCD design and user training may be warranted to minimize maldeployment risks.
  • Patient safety protocols should address potential complications associated with arterial closure device use.