Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy
Kenneth S Smith1, Katherine Drexelius2, Shanthan Challa1
1Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, CO, USA.
Adding ankle arthroscopy to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for ankle fractures significantly improves patient outcomes and satisfaction. This procedure, while slightly increasing operative time, does not raise complication rates for Weber B fractures and dislocations.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Sports Medicine
- Traumatology
Background:
- Ankle fractures are common orthopedic injuries with a high rate of satisfactory outcomes after surgical fixation.
- Persistent pain can occur despite anatomic reduction, with intra-articular injuries being a potential contributing factor.
- The clinical impact of incorporating ankle arthroscopy during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for ankle fractures requires assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical impact of performing ankle arthroscopy concurrently with ORIF for bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fractures.
- To compare patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction rates between ORIF alone and ORIF with arthroscopy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 213 patients (2014-2018) with bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fractures undergoing operative fixation.
- Data collected included demographics, fracture patterns, operative procedures (ORIF vs. ORIF plus arthroscopy), tourniquet times, and arthroscopic findings.
- A phone and e-mail survey assessed outcomes, achieving a 50.7% follow-up rate at an average of 32.4 months.
Main Results:
- The arthroscopy group experienced a 10-minute longer average tourniquet time (89 vs. 79 minutes).
- Arthroscopy revealed significant rates of intra-articular pathology: 28% osteochondral lesions, 33% loose bodies, and 49% cartilage injury.
- Weber B fibula fractures treated with arthroscopy showed higher Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) physical function scores (45.8 vs. 42.3, P=.012) and patient satisfaction (93% vs. 75%, P=.05).
- Patients with tibiotalar joint dislocation treated with arthroscopy had significantly higher PROMIS scores (46.6 vs. 40.2, P=.005).
Conclusions:
- Ankle arthroscopy performed during ORIF for ankle fractures leads to statistically significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes for Weber B fibula fractures and ankle dislocations.
- The addition of arthroscopy did not increase complication rates.
- The average operative time increased by only 10 minutes with the inclusion of arthroscopy.
More Related Videos
07:24Autologous Microfractured and Purified Adipose Tissue for Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus
Published on: January 23, 2018
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Ankle Joint