Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

21
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
21
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

10.4K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
10.4K
What is a Hypothesis?01:14

What is a Hypothesis?

13.1K
A hypothesis can be a simple sentence or statement about a property or any phenomenon observed or predicted for a population. It is usually a claim about a  property of the population. It can be stated for any field observations or experiments. A hypothesis statement cannot be said to be right or wrong as it is merely a statement. It needs to be tested through an elaborate data collection process and an appropriate statistical test. A hypothesis should be a general but not a vague...
13.1K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.0K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.0K
Schemas01:42

Schemas

12.1K
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
12.1K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

28.5K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
28.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of convergent and independent pathways in neural networks during second-order conditioning and blocking procedures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2025
Same author

Is a Nervous System Necessary for Learning?

Perspectives on behavior science·2020
Same author

Suing for Peace in the War Against Mentalism.

Perspectives on behavior science·2020
Same journal

A Mediational Theory of Verbal Relations.

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
Same journal

It is Time to Retire "Noncontingent Reinforcement".

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
Same journal

Using Wearable Technology to Predict the Occurrence of Severe Behavior Problems among Neurodiverse Individuals: A Systematic Review.

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
Same journal

Toward a Modern View of Pavlovian Conditioning in Applied Behavior Analysis.

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
Same journal

Behavior, Process, and Evolution in the Multiscale Molar Paradigm.

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
Same journal

Citing the Literature.

Perspectives on behavior science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K

The Real Problem with Hypothetical Constructs.

José E Burgos1

  • 1Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones en Comportamiento, University of Guadalajara, Av. Fco. de Quevedo, 180, Arcos Vallarta, 44130 Guadalajara, Jalisco Mexico.

Perspectives on Behavior Science
|January 31, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The concept of hypothetical constructs in psychology is unintelligible, challenging the observable-unobservable distinction. This philosophical issue questions the validity of using unobservable entities in psychological research.

Keywords:
hypothetical constructslogical positivismobservablepsychologyunobservable

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.2K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.2K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Discussions on internal clocks in psychology often overlook fundamental conceptual issues.
  • The reliance on hypothetical constructs (HCs) is a central, yet problematic, aspect of psychological theory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the intelligibility of the hypothetical construct concept in psychology.
  • To challenge the foundational observable-unobservable distinction used in psychological research.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of the concept of hypothetical constructs.
  • Review of arguments from the philosophy of science regarding observability.

Main Results:

  • The concept of a hypothetical construct is fundamentally unintelligible.
  • The observable-unobservable distinction, a remnant of logical positivism, is untenable in psychology.
  • Previous discussions on HCs have ignored compelling philosophical arguments against their use.

Conclusions:

  • Talk of observability, unobservability, and HCs in psychology should be questioned or ceased.
  • The current framework for discussing HCs is philosophically unsound and potentially harmful to scientific progress.