Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
Effects of Functional Rhinoplasty on Nasal Obstruction: A Meta-Analysis
Rui Zhao1,2, Kai Chen1,3, Yuedi Tang4
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo-Xue-Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Background:
Functional rhinoplasty (FRP) is used to improve nasal ventilation by correcting problems with the nasal valves. It has not been systematically reviewed on a large scale.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies evaluating nasal obstruction before and after functional rhinoplasty in patients with nasal valve problems.
Results:
A total of 57 cohorts from 43 studies involving 2024 patients were included in the current meta-analysis. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores indicated significant improvement in nasal obstruction at the 1-month follow-up (WMD = 38.12; 95% CI, 29.15-47.10; I2 = 83.6%; P = 0.00), 3-month follow-up (WMD = 48.40; 95% CI, 43.16-53.64; I2 = 69.1%; P = 0.00), 6-month follow-up (WMD = 44.35; 95% CI, 36.65-52.04; I2 = 96.6%; P = 0.00), 12-month follow-up (WMD=43.07; 95% CI, 26.56-59.58; I2 = 97.9%; P = 0.00), and the last follow-up (WMD = 46.90; 95% CI, 43.92-49.88; I2 = 95.9%; P = 0.00) with respect to the preoperative baseline. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores indicated a similar trend at the 1-month follow-up (WMD = 4.68; 95% CI, 3.79-5.57; I2 = 86.8%; P = 0.00), 3-month follow-up (WMD = 4.46; 95% CI, 3.19-5.74; I2 = 93.3%; P = 0.00), 6-month follow-up (WMD = 4.91; 95% CI, 4.04-5.78; I2 = 88%; P = 0.00) and last follow-up (WMD = 4.22; 95% CI, 3.12-5.32; I2 = 97.1%; P = 0.00). Nasal obstruction was obviously relieved through rhinomanometry (SMD=0.56; 95% CI, 0.27-0.84; I2 = 0.0%; P = 0.00) but not through peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) (SMD=-1.51; 95% CI, -3.10 to 0.07; I2 = 98.9%; P = 0.09).
Conclusion:
FRP may have a positive effect on nasal obstruction caused by nasal valve problems. Broader and well-designed studies are needed to shed more light on the relationships in this area.
Level Of Evidence Iii:
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Related Concept Videos
Nose and Nasal Cavity
Epistaxis
Etiology
Possible causes of this condition include high blood pressure, trauma, low humidity, upper respiratory tract infections, allergies, foreign bodies, nasal inhalation of corticosteroids or illicit drugs, excessive use of decongestant nasal sprays, facial or nasal surgery, anatomic malformation, tumors, or systemic...
Drugs Used in Upper Respiratory Disorders: Overview
Antihistamines (e.g., Benadryl) block histamines from binding. Histamines are chemicals released during an allergic reaction in the body. As a...
Olfactory Receptors: Location and Structure
Upper Respiratory Drugs: Decongestants
Most decongestants are readily available over-the-counter in...

