Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Valuing treatment in oncology: embracing a broader notion of value
Sachin Kamal-Bahl1, Justin Puckett2, Amitabh Singh3
1COVIA Health Solutions, Lansdale, PA.
Abstract:
Over the past decade, we have witnessed unprecedented, groundbreaking innovation in pharmaceuticals. This has been particularly true in oncology, where new therapies have increased survival and at times offered clinical cure. However, the impact of these promising treatments has been attenuated by persistent access and cost challenges that may limit their effect. A narrative has emerged that many of these so-called breakthroughs are not priced according to the value they provide. Traditional cost-effectiveness analyses would appear to support these doubts, often suggesting that innovative therapies do not represent value for money. However, there is a case to be made that innovative therapies require equally innovative value assessments. To explore this emerging viewpoint, this article provides a brief introduction to the current value debate and oncology-specific considerations when assessing elements of value. We offer a brief background on the nature and development of quality-adjusted life-years as a part of cost-effectiveness analyses and some of their key limitations; a primer on "novel" elements of value, which capture specific aspects of patient and societal preferences not included in quality-adjusted life-years; and their applicability to oncology including discussion on areas where further thought and research might be needed. We conclude with a potential checklist of novel elements of value that should be considered. DISCLOSURES: This Viewpoints article was funded by Novartis, Inc., which also provided funding to COVIA Health Solutions for manuscript development. The sponsor was involved in developing the manuscript. Kamal-Bahl and Puckett are employees of COVIA Health Solutions, a consulting firm that provides services to biopharmaceutical clients, trade organizations, and foundations. Kamal-Bahl holds stock in Merck and Pfizer. Singh is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Willke received personal fees from COVIA Health Solutions for work on the manuscript.
Insights
Innovative cancer therapies offer survival benefits but face access and cost barriers. Traditional value assessments may not capture the full worth of these breakthroughs, necessitating novel evaluation methods for oncology treatments.
Area of Science:
- Pharmaceutical innovation
- Oncology therapeutics
- Health economics
Background:
- Recent pharmaceutical advancements, especially in oncology, have significantly improved patient survival and treatment outcomes.
- Despite therapeutic success, challenges in accessing and affording these novel treatments persist, limiting their overall impact.
- Concerns exist regarding the pricing of breakthrough therapies relative to their perceived value, questioning traditional cost-effectiveness analyses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce the ongoing debate surrounding the value of innovative oncology therapies.
- To examine oncology-specific considerations for assessing treatment value.
- To explore limitations of traditional value assessment tools and introduce novel elements of value.
Main Methods:
- Review of current value assessment methodologies in healthcare.
- Discussion of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and their limitations.
- Introduction and explanation of novel elements of value beyond QALYs.
Main Results:
- Traditional cost-effectiveness analyses, such as those using QALYs, may not fully capture the value of innovative oncology treatments.
- Novel elements of value are proposed to incorporate broader patient and societal preferences.
- These novel elements are particularly relevant for assessing the multifaceted value of cancer therapies.
Conclusions:
- Innovative oncology therapies may require novel value assessment frameworks beyond traditional methods.
- Incorporating a wider range of value elements is crucial for accurately reflecting the worth of cancer treatments.
- Further research is needed to refine and apply these novel value assessment tools in oncology.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...

