Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
Published on: September 12, 2014
Balancing the Freedom-Security Trade-Off During Crises and Disasters
Nathan N Cheek1, Elena Reutskaja2, Barry Schwartz3
1Department of Psychology, Princeton University.
Abstract:
During crises and disasters, such as hurricanes, terrorist threats, or pandemics, policymakers must often increase security at the cost of freedom. Psychological science, however, has shown that the restriction of freedom may have strong negative consequences for behavior and health. We suggest that psychology can inform policy both by elucidating some negative consequences of lost freedom (e.g., depression or behavioral reactance) and by revealing strategies to address them. We propose four interlocking principles that can help policymakers restore the freedom-security balance. Careful consideration of the psychology of freedom can help policymakers develop policies that most effectively promote public health, safety, and well-being when crises and disasters strike.
Related Concept Videos
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Bystander Effect
Social Traps
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Coping Strategies: Problem Focused
For example, consider a student who struggles to understand their...

