Pertussis burden and acellular pertussis vaccine effectiveness in high risk children

Sarah Sheridan1, Peter McIntyre2, Bette Liu3

  • 1School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Medicine, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Women and Babies Research, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney Northern Clinical School, NSW, Australia; National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Vaccine
|February 1, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Acellular pertussis vaccine effectiveness varies significantly in high-risk infants. Indigenous infants and those with comorbidities show lower protection, necessitating further research into enhanced vaccination strategies for vulnerable populations.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Public Health
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • Pertussis (whooping cough) hospitalisation disproportionately affects premature infants, those with comorbidities, and Indigenous children.
  • Existing acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine effectiveness (VE) data lacks granularity for these critical subgroups.
  • Understanding VE in vulnerable populations is crucial for targeted public health interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To measure aP vaccine effectiveness (VE) stratified by Indigenous status, prematurity, and comorbidities in Australian infants.
  • To identify specific subgroups of infants with potentially reduced vaccine protection.
  • To inform public health policy regarding pertussis prevention in high-risk infant populations.

Main Methods:

  • Linked population-based data from Western Australia and New South Wales (2001-2013) were used.
  • Infants were followed to 18 months of age and stratified by Aboriginality, gestational age (<32 vs 32-<37 weeks), and comorbidities.
  • Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models calculated rates, rate ratios, and VE for hospitalised and non-hospitalised pertussis notifications.

Main Results:

  • Among over 1.3 million children, significant VE was observed for hospitalised pertussis in both Aboriginal (post-dose 3: 76%) and non-Aboriginal (post-dose 3: 80%) children.
  • Infants with comorbidities showed low and non-significant VE post-dose 1 (0%) and dose 2 (30%) for hospitalised pertussis.
  • Post-dose 3, VE was significant for hospitalised pertussis (70%) in children with comorbidities, but not for non-hospitalised pertussis (24%).

Conclusions:

  • While current infant pertussis vaccination schedules offer protection, improved timeliness and antenatal coverage are recommended for all infants.
  • Infants born extremely prematurely (<32 weeks gestation) or with significant medical comorbidities require additional strategies.
  • Further research into additional vaccine doses or improved immunogenicity vaccines is warranted for highest-risk infants to ensure adequate pertussis protection.
Abstract