Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
Published on: January 31, 2017
Dream recall frequency is associated with attention rather than with working memory abilities
Salomé Blain1,2, Aurélien de la Chapelle1,2, Anne Caclin1,2
1Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS, UMR5292, INSERM, U1028, Lyon, France.
High dream recallers (HR) show behavioral evidence of being less resistant to distractors compared to low dream recallers (LR). This study reveals new insights into attention and working memory differences in dream recall.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Sleep Research
- Psychology
Background:
- Dream recall frequency (DRF) is influenced by various factors, but cognitive differences between low (LR) and high dream recallers (HR) are not fully understood.
- Existing research on short-term memory and attention in LR and HR has yielded contradictory or inconclusive results, particularly at the behavioral level.
- The arousal-retrieval model suggests a link between memory encoding, wakefulness, and short-term memory for dreams.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate behavioral differences in attention and working memory between high dream recallers (HR) and low dream recallers (LR).
- To examine the interaction between selective attention and working memory during memory encoding using a novel task.
- To provide empirical evidence for attentional differences at the behavioral level in individuals with varying dream recall frequencies.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a novel "MEMory and ATtention" (MEMAT) paradigm to assess selective attention and working memory.
- Employed non-verbal auditory stimuli and manipulated distractor difficulty and memory task load.
- Compared the performance (accuracy and reaction time) of low and high dream recallers under different cognitive load conditions.
Main Results:
- Working memory load did not differentially impact the performance of LR and HR groups.
- High dream recallers (HR) exhibited slower reaction times and reduced accuracy when faced with difficult-to-ignore distractors compared to easy distractors.
- Low dream recallers (LR) were less affected by the difficulty of the distractor, showing more consistent performance across conditions.
Conclusions:
- This study provides the first behavioral evidence of attentional differences between high and low dream recallers.
- High dream recallers demonstrate less resistance to salient, hard-to-ignore distractors, suggesting a potential difference in attentional control.
- The findings contribute to understanding the interplay of auditory attention, working memory, and dream recall mechanisms.
More Related Videos
08:45A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
Published on: December 5, 2014
14:24An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
Published on: July 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Working Memory
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Chunking and Rehearsal in Sensory Memory
Retrieval
Recall involves accessing information without cues, such as during an essay test, where individuals must retrieve facts and concepts from memory unaided. Another example is remembering the name of a colleague...
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Traumatic Memory