Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

294
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
294
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

172
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
172
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.1K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.0K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.0K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

325
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
325
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

13.0K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
13.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Causal effect estimation from trans-regulatory single-cell CRISPR screens.

Cell genomics·2026
Same author

Fair and Robust Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects for Optimal Policies in Multilevel Studies.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same author

Comparison of Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Observational Studies and Application to Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitive Decline.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

An approach to estimating how effective and well targeted Extreme Risk Protection Orders have been with respect to suicide prevention.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Discussion on 'Causal inference with misspecified network interference structure' by Bar Weinstein and Daniel Nevo.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Causal Mediation and Functional Outcome Analysis with Process Data.

Psychometrika·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Tuning Random Forests for Causal Inference under Cluster-Level Unmeasured Confounding.

Youmi Suk1, Hyunseung Kang2

  • 1School of Data Science, University of Virginia.

Multivariate Behavioral Research
|February 1, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning for causal inference, specifically Causal Forests, can be made robust to unmeasured confounding. Modifications improve bias resistance in estimates, enhancing causal inference reliability.

Keywords:
Causal inferencefixed effects modelsmachine learning methodsomitted variable biasunmeasured variables

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

229

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

229

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Causal Inference
  • Econometrics

Background:

  • Machine learning offers flexible modeling for causal inference, particularly for propensity scores and outcome models.
  • Existing machine learning methods often assume no unmeasured confounding, limiting their application in real-world scenarios with potential omitted variable bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate modifications to Causal Forests to enhance robustness against cluster-level unmeasured confounding.
  • To assess the performance of modified Causal Forests compared to traditional methods under unmeasured confounding.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced five modifications to the tuning procedure of Causal Forests.
  • Utilized simulation studies to compare modified Causal Forests with existing methods.
  • Applied the modified methods to real-world data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study.

Main Results:

  • Adjusting Causal Forests with propensity scores from fixed effects logistic regression or cluster-mean centered variables improved robustness to unmeasured confounding.
  • Modified machine learning methods demonstrated resilience to bias from cluster-level unmeasured confounders, even with mis-specified parametric propensity score models.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed modifications offer a more reliable approach to causal inference using machine learning when unmeasured confounding is present.
  • These methods provide a valuable tool for researchers dealing with complex observational data and potential biases.