Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 5, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Why citizen review might beat peer review at identifying pursuitworthy scientific research
1Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, United States.
Abstract:
In response to increasing fatigue with the failings of the peer review system, granting agencies are beginning to consider lotteries as an alternative. I argue that citizen review, in which non-scientists determine funding allocations, has advantages over both. This is particularly true when it comes to identifying which research is most pursuitworthy.
More Related Videos
08:19Quantitative Comparison of cis-Regulatory Element CRE Activities in Transgenic Drosophila melanogaster
Published on: December 19, 2011
09:46Direct Comparison of Hyperspectral Stimulated Raman Scattering and Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Microscopy for Chemical Imaging
Published on: April 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Naturalistic Observations
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Blind Procedures