Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Yeast As a Chassis for Developing Functional Assays to Study Human P53
Published on: August 4, 2019
Molecular characterization of mutant TP53 acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome
Tim Grob1, Adil S A Al Hinai1,2, Mathijs A Sanders1
1Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Substantial heterogeneity within mutant TP53 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome with excess of blast (MDS-EB) precludes the exact assessment of prognostic impact for individual patients. We performed in-depth clinical and molecular analysis of mutant TP53 AML and MDS-EB to dissect the molecular characteristics in detail and determine its impact on survival. We performed next-generation sequencing on 2200 AML/MDS-EB specimens and assessed the TP53 mutant allelic status (mono- or bi-allelic), the number of TP53 mutations, mutant TP53 clone size, concurrent mutations, cytogenetics, and mutant TP53 molecular minimal residual disease and studied the associations of these characteristics with overall survival. TP53 mutations were detected in 230 (10.5%) patients with AML/MDS-EB with a median variant allele frequency of 47%. Bi-allelic mutant TP53 status was observed in 174 (76%) patients. Multiple TP53 mutations were found in 49 (21%) patients. Concurrent mutations were detected in 113 (49%) patients. No significant difference in any of the aforementioned molecular characteristics of mutant TP53 was detected between AML and MDS-EB. Patients with mutant TP53 have a poor outcome (2-year overall survival, 12.8%); however, no survival difference between AML and MDS-EB was observed. Importantly, none of the molecular characteristics were significantly associated with survival in mutant TP53 AML/MDS-EB. In most patients, TP53 mutations remained detectable in complete remission by deep sequencing (73%). Detection of residual mutant TP53 was not associated with survival. Mutant TP53 AML and MDS-EB do not differ with respect to molecular characteristics and survival. Therefore, mutant TP53 AML/MDS-EB should be considered a distinct molecular disease entity.
Insights
Mutant TP53 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome with excess of blast (MDS-EB) share similar molecular traits and poor survival outcomes. These conditions should be recognized as a single molecular disease entity.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Mutant TP53 is a common driver mutation in hematologic malignancies.
- Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome with excess of blast (MDS-EB) exhibit significant heterogeneity, complicating prognostic assessments.
- Understanding the molecular landscape of TP53 mutations is crucial for refining diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To perform detailed clinical and molecular analysis of mutant TP53 in AML and MDS-EB.
- To dissect the molecular characteristics and their impact on survival in these patient cohorts.
- To determine if mutant TP53 AML and MDS-EB represent distinct or unified disease entities.
Main Methods:
- Next-generation sequencing of 2200 AML/MDS-EB specimens.
- Assessment of TP53 mutant allelic status, mutation number, clone size, and concurrent mutations.
- Analysis of cytogenetics, molecular minimal residual disease, and overall survival associations.
Main Results:
- TP53 mutations found in 10.5% of patients; bi-allelic status in 76% and multiple mutations in 21%.
- No significant differences in molecular characteristics or survival between mutant TP53 AML and MDS-EB.
- None of the assessed molecular features significantly impacted survival; residual mutant TP53 was not associated with outcome.
Conclusions:
- Mutant TP53 AML and MDS-EB exhibit comparable molecular profiles and dismal prognoses.
- These findings support classifying mutant TP53 AML and MDS-EB as a single molecular disease entity.
- This unified classification may guide future therapeutic approaches and clinical trial designs.

