Analysis of racial and ethnic disparities in multiple myeloma US FDA drug approval trials

Bindu Kanapuru1, Laura L Fernandes2, Lola A Fashoyin-Aje3

  • 1Division of Hematologic Malignancies II.

Blood Advances
|February 3, 2022
PubMed

Insights

African Americans face higher multiple myeloma (MM) incidence and mortality. MM clinical trials underrepresented Black and Hispanic patients, particularly outside the US, impacting outcome analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Health Disparities

Background:

  • Multiple myeloma (MM) disproportionately affects African Americans (AAs), with higher incidence and mortality rates compared to White patients.
  • AAs also exhibit distinct genetic profiles, including a higher prevalence of immunoglobulin H translocations t(11;14) and t(14;16).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the demographic representation of racial and ethnic groups in multiple myeloma clinical trials.
  • To evaluate treatment outcomes based on race and ethnicity in these trials.

Main Methods:

  • A pooled analysis of 19 global clinical trials supporting US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for MM therapeutics (2006-2019) was conducted.
  • Demographic data were analyzed, and age-adjusted Cox regression models assessed time-to-event outcomes stratified by race and ethnicity.

Main Results:

  • White patients constituted 84% of the 10,157 participants; Black patients represented 4% and Hispanic patients 4%.
  • Black patients were predominantly enrolled in US-based trials. Overall survival showed a trend favoring Black patients in the US (HR 0.82) but was less favorable outside the US (HR 1.31).
  • Significant underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic populations was observed in trials supporting MM drug approvals.

Conclusions:

  • African Americans and Hispanic patients remain underrepresented in pivotal multiple myeloma clinical trials.
  • The geographic distribution of Black patients in trials (primarily US-based) may influence outcome interpretations.
  • Increased efforts are crucial to enhance the inclusion of diverse populations, particularly African Americans, in MM clinical trials to ensure generalizability of findings and equitable therapeutic development.

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers01:13

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

Body:In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...
8
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
332
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables01:28

Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables

Body:Biologics, derived from living sources such as humans, animals, or microorganisms, represent a significant category of pharmaceuticals. These complex molecules, developed through advanced biotechnological methods or purified from natural sources, include essential medical treatments like insulin and growth hormones. The complexity of biologics arises from their large molecular structures and the intricate processes required for their production, making them distinct from conventional...
5
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications01:09

Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

The concept of therapeutic equivalence (TE) in drugs with multiple indications is complex. A generic drug may be therapeutically equivalent to a brand-name product for one specific indication, but this doesn't necessarily mean it's equivalent for all other indications. Evidence of TE in one patient group and bioequivalence shown in healthy volunteers can support—but not confirm—TE for other indications. However, definitive proof requires individual clinical studies for each...
6
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
3.7K
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
5.1K