Is Partially Thrombosed False Lumen Really a Predictor for Adverse Events in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection:...

This meta-analysis and systematic review investigated whether partial thrombosed false lumen was a predictor for adverse events in uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection (TBAD).

We performed the current systematic review of the medical literature according to the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of individual studies. Search terms based on the MEDLINE database included "type B aortic dissection," "false lumen" and "thrombosis." The primary outcomes included mortality, intervention, and aortic growth.

Six studies were included in this systematic review, with a total number of 692 patients, including 197 patency (28.5%), 214 partial thrombosis (30.9%), and 281 complete thrombosis (40.6%). Due to the insufficient data for quantitative analysis, we only conducted a scoping review for mortality and intervention. For aortic growth, we conducted a meta-analysis based on Standardized Mean Difference (SMD). The SMD of PT vs. P by random effect model was -0.05 (random effect model) [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.39 to 0.29]. The 95% CI crossed with the null line of 0, indicating no significant difference. The SMD was 0.37 (fixed effects model) (95% CI, 0.03-0.71) and 0.70 (fixed effects model) (95% CI, 0.37-1.04) for PT vs. CT, and P vs. CT, respectively.

Current researches on partial thrombosis of TBAD are inconsistent. Partial thrombosis is not associated with a faster aortic growth rate. Until more solid evidence is available, we do not recommend partial thrombosis as a surgical indication or high-risk profile for TBAD.Systematic Review Registration: Unique Identifier: CRD42019121912.