Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme
Maryam Onifade1, Marie-Hélène Roy-Gagnon2, Marie-Élise Parent3
1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
For extreme phenotype sampling (EPS) genome-wide association studies, LEAP and GMMAT control type I error rates, unlike CARAT. Careful model selection is crucial for accurate results in EPS studies, especially for rare variants.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Statistical Genetics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Mixed models are essential for correcting confounding in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) due to population stratification and relatedness.
- Existing mixed model approaches have been validated for continuous and case-control traits but not specifically for extreme phenotype sampling (EPS).
- EPS involves collecting genetic data only from individuals with extreme trait values, posing unique analytical challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of established binary trait mixed model approaches (GMMAT, LEAP, CARAT) in the context of EPS data.
- To evaluate the utility of a linear mixed model implementation (GEMMA) for binary traits within an EPS framework.
- To assess type I error rates and statistical power across different mixed model methods under simulated population substructure.
Main Methods:
- Utilized simulation studies to estimate type I error rates and power for GMMAT, LEAP, CARAT, and GEMMA.
- Applied the evaluated methods to a real-world case-control dataset from Québec, Canada, known for its population substructure.
- Focused on assessing performance for both common and rare genetic variants.
Main Results:
- LEAP and GMMAT demonstrated effective control of type I error rates for common variants in EPS data, while CARAT showed inflated rates.
- Similar type I error control was observed when analyzing the real-world Québec dataset.
- For rare variants, the false positive rate remained elevated across methods, even after mixed model corrections.
- Methods that controlled type I error exhibited comparable statistical power.
Conclusions:
- The choice of mixed model methodology significantly impacts type I error control in EPS studies.
- Researchers must carefully select models that align with the specific sampling strategy (EPS) and the minor allele frequency of candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).
- Further investigation is needed for robust mixed model approaches for rare variants in EPS settings.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...

