Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies.

G H Guyatt, P X Tugwell, D H Feeny

    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal De L'Association Medicale Canadienne
    |March 15, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    New diagnostic technologies require thorough evaluation to ensure they improve patient health outcomes. Rigorous assessment is crucial for efficient healthcare resource allocation and patient benefit.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Relationship between T90 and systemic hypertension in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: Data from the European sleep apnea database.

    European journal of internal medicine·2026
    Same author

    Prevalence of Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium lepromatosis in roadkill armadillos in Brazil.

    Acta tropica·2024
    Same author

    Chromothripsis orchestrates leukemic transformation in blast phase MPN through targetable amplification of <i>DYRK1A</i>.

    bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023
    Same author

    Abstracts of presentations to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Canadian Association of General Surgeons Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons: Canadian Surgery Forum, Toronto, Ont., September 6-9, 2007.

    Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2023
    Same author

    Hypofractionated or Conventionally Fractionated Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Regional Lymph Node Dissection for High-Risk Stage III Melanoma.

    Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2022
    Same author

    Teleconsultation in respiratory medicine - A position paper of the Portuguese Pulmonology Society.

    Pulmonology·2022

    Area of Science:

    • Health Technology Assessment
    • Diagnostic Technology Evaluation
    • Clinical Research Methodology

    Background:

    • Many new diagnostic technologies lack adequate assessment of their real-world health benefits.
    • Comprehensive evaluation must include technologic capability, accuracy, and impact on patient outcomes.
    • Current assessment practices may not sufficiently guarantee patient benefit.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present guidelines for the comprehensive evaluation of diagnostic technologies.
    • To define criteria for the dissemination of new diagnostic tools.
    • To emphasize the importance of rigorous assessment for healthcare resource efficiency.

    Main Methods:

    • Review and synthesis of criteria for evaluating diagnostic technologies.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of study designs, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), for assessing patient benefit.
  • Presentation of guidelines for determining adequate assessment of diagnostic capabilities and impacts.
  • Main Results:

    • Diagnostic technologies should be disseminated only if they offer advantages over existing methods (cost, safety, accuracy) or enable effective therapy.
    • Establishing patient benefit often necessitates randomized controlled trials.
    • Alternative study designs may be less logistically demanding but less accurate in assessing benefit.

    Conclusions:

    • Rigorous assessment of diagnostic technologies is essential for ensuring patient benefit and optimizing healthcare resource utilization.
    • Clear guidelines are needed to ensure new diagnostic technologies are adequately evaluated before widespread adoption.
    • A systematic approach to evaluation is critical for evidence-based healthcare decisions.