Adaptive pressure-driven multi-criteria spatial decision-making for a targeted placement of green and grey runoff...

Traditional runoff control measures ignore the spatial imbalance of regional pressures, thereby failing to achieve a site-specific placement for green and grey infrastructure simultaneously. A multi-criterion decision-making framework for runoff control infrastructure spatial planning was therefore developed in this study. The pressure-state-response framework was applied to creatively match the pressure induced adjustment demands with the infrastructure effectiveness. The pressures were quantified from the perspective of environment, economy, and ecology on a grid scale. States were considered as the relative priority of regional pressure adjustment demand in multiple perspectives. Responses were presented as state-targeted green and grey infrastructure placement. Multi-perspective effectiveness of different green and grey infrastructure was simultaneously evaluated at an effective scale of controlling 1 m³/s runoff for comparison. Methods such as data mining, hydrological model simulation, and remote sensing inversion were combined to quantify the regional pressures. The capital investment and ecological impact of infrastructures were quantified from a life cycle perspective. A case study was carried out in Wuhan, China. The study area was clustered by gridded pressure into three regions. In region Ⅰ, ecological and environmental pressure were of higher weight. In region Ⅱ, the environmental pressure was dominant. In region Ⅲ, the ecological pressure took precedence over the environmental and economic constraints. The area ratios of the region Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ were 43%, 36%, and 21% respectively. The result indicated a synergy and spatial heterogeneity of multi-perspective pressures, and further demonstrating that expert experience tends to fail to weigh the multi-function of green and grey infrastructures for coping with the pressures. Results also stated that green infrastructures were more acceptable in areas that aspire to achieve simultaneous runoff control and ecological improvement. The decision-making framework developed in this study can maximize the overall performance by providing targeted infrastructure placement solutions.