Safety of Antithrombotic Resumption in Chronic Subdural Hematoma Patients with Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization: A Case Control Study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Embolic Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion MCAO for Ischemic Stroke with Homologous Blood Clots in Rats
Published on: September 17, 2014
Osman Mir1, Shadi Yaghi2, Deep Pujara3
1Departments of Radiology, New York University Langone Health, New York NY, 10016.
Objective:
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a serious problem with an incidence of 20.6/100,000/year in North America and is posited to grow as the population ages. Middle Meningeal Artery (MMA) embolization is an upcoming therapy for treatment of CSDH. Among patients with CSDH who undergo MMA embolization outcomes are no different in patients who resume the antithrombotic (AT) after MMA embolization as compared to patients who don't resume AT.
Methods:
We did retrospective review of all cases of MMA embolization in the setting of CSDH done over 2.5 years in 2 centers. Comparison of cases in which AT was resumed vs controls with no AT was performed. A successful outcome was defined as reduction of at least 50% volume in CSDH. Univariate analysis regarding all outcome measures for baseline variables was performed using Fisher exact test or t-test. Multivariate logistic regression with controlling for age, surgical evacuation of the hematoma.
Results:
There were a total of 56 MMA embolization cases, 33 of them had no AT started and 23 of them had AT resumption at a mean of 2.4 days. About 40% of patients had surgical evacuation done prior to MMA embolization. There was no significant difference in hematoma reduction or volume even after adjusting for surgical evacuation (OR 1.00 95%CI 0.60- 1.67). Patients who had AT resumption had more CAD (71%vs 21% p= 0.001) and Afib (58% vs 18% p=0.002) necessitating AT.
Conclusion:
AT therapy can be safely resumed in CSDH after MMA embolization as there is no significant difference in CSDH volume reduction and recurrence.

