Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

05:48
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
5.9K
Group decision making under uncertain preferences: powered by AI, empowered by AI
1Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
|February 5, 2022
Summary
This study surveys recent AI advancements for group decision-making, addressing conflicting preferences in collective choices. AI systems leverage interdisciplinary methods to enhance group decisions, even with uncertain preferences and at large scales.
Area of Science:
- Computer Science
- Cognitive Science
- Economics
- Political Science
- Statistics
- Mathematics
Background:
- Group decision-making is a fundamental societal challenge involving agents with conflicting preferences.
- This problem has been extensively studied across various academic disciplines for decades.
- Existing approaches often struggle with uncertainty and scale in collective decision processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To survey recent theoretical, algorithmic, and engineering progress in AI-powered group decision-making systems.
- To explore how AI can help agents make collective decisions with uncertain preferences.
- To highlight the interdisciplinary nature of developing advanced AI for group decisions.
Main Methods:
- Leveraging principles from economics, political science, cognitive and behavioral sciences, statistics, mathematics, and computer science.
- Developing theoretical frameworks for understanding AI in group decision contexts.
- Designing and implementing algorithmic and engineering solutions for AI-driven decision support.
- Integrating methodologies from multiple disciplines to create robust AI systems.
Main Results:
- Recent AI advancements offer powerful tools for tackling complex group decision problems.
- AI systems can effectively handle uncertain preferences, a common challenge in collective choices.
- Interdisciplinary approaches are crucial for building sophisticated AI for group decision support.
- AI empowers group decision-making to operate effectively in broader and larger-scale situations.
Conclusions:
- AI is transforming the field of group decision-making by providing scalable and adaptable solutions.
- Future research should continue to integrate diverse methodologies to advance AI in this domain.
- AI-powered systems hold significant potential to improve collective decision outcomes across various societal contexts.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making
286
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
286
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.3K
Decision Making: P-value Method
5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Reason and Intuition
7.0K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.0K
Impact of Individuals on a Group
29
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
29
Groupthink
46.0K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
46.0K

