Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

09:03
Rapid In Vivo Assessment of Adjuvant's Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Generation Capabilities for Vaccine Development
Published on: June 19, 2018
8.8K
Implementing a Clinical Immunogenicity Strategy using Preclinical Risk Assessment Outputs.
Vibha Jawa1, Jad Maamary2, Michael Swanson3
1Nonclinical Disposition and Bioanalysis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ 08648, USA.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
|February 5, 2022
Summary
Assessing immunogenicity risk for biologics is crucial. This paper reviews preclinical risk assessment tools to predict and mitigate immune responses, guiding clinical strategies and regulatory submissions.
Area of Science:
- Biopharmaceutical Development
- Immunology
- Risk Assessment
Background:
- Immunogenicity to biologic drugs is a frequent challenge in clinical trials, influenced by both product characteristics and host factors.
- Predicting clinical immune responses remains difficult due to the complex immune system and patient variability, despite risk factor identification.
- Current methods for identifying and mitigating immunogenicity risks prior to human trials are essential but have limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of recent advancements in preclinical risk assessment approaches for biologic drug development.
- To highlight how these tools can aid in selecting candidates with lower immunogenicity risk.
- To guide the development of effective clinical bioanalytical and immunogenicity monitoring strategies.
Main Methods:
- Review of current preclinical risk assessment tools and methodologies for evaluating immunogenicity.
- Discussion of systematic approaches for identifying and mitigating potential immunogenic risks.
- Exploration of integrating pharmacogenomics and patient-specific factors into risk assessment.
Main Results:
- Advanced risk assessment tools can help rank biologic candidates based on their likelihood of eliciting an immune response.
- Outputs from these tools can inform the development of tailored clinical immunogenicity monitoring plans.
- A structured roadmap for performing risk assessments and their documentation for regulatory submissions is proposed.
Conclusions:
- Systematic preclinical risk assessment is vital for optimizing biologic drug development and minimizing clinical immunogenicity.
- Proactive risk assessment and mitigation strategies can streamline regulatory processes and personalize patient outcomes.
- Recommendations are provided for incorporating robust risk assessment components into Investigational New Drug (IND) applications and Integrated Summaries of Immunogenicity.
Related Concept Videos
Preclinical Development: Overview
5.1K
Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
5.1K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
190
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
190
Clinical Trials: Overview
3.7K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
3.7K

