Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management
Published on: September 12, 2017
Can ecological landscape pattern influence dry-wet dynamics? A national scale assessment in China from 1980 to 2018
Yang Han1, Di Chang2, Xiao-Zhi Xiang3
1Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453002, China.
Abstract:
Land cover has been demonstrated to have substantial impacts on climate and dry-wet environment, but potential influence of landscape pattern dynamics accompanying land cover change on drought remains unclear. In this study, response of dry-wet dynamics to landscape pattern in China was examined. Results suggest that landscape pattern in China's nine agricultural districts had transformed to varying extents and showed spatiotemporal heterogeneity from 1980 to 2018. For forest landscape, the highest annual average Percentage of Landscape (PLAND) was recorded in SC, reaching 62.26%; and the highest Largest Patch Index (LPI) was presented in YGP, followed by SC, with annual values of 53.79% and 46.26% respectively. The QTP has the most prominent forest connectivity in spite of its lower abundance. For grass landscape, the highest abundance and dominance were recorded in QTP, with annual PLAND fluctuation range of 49.66%-63.52% and annual LPI variation range of 34.10%-58.46%, which is associated with its climate and altitude. The most prominent crop landscape abundance and dominance were recorded in HHHP, with annual PLAND fluctuating interval of 56.53%-60.64%, indicating the highest agricultural development level in this district. At landscape level, dry-wet circumstance could be improved with enhancements in the largest patch percentage, patch density and spatial connectivity, while worsen with increases of landscape fragmentation and separated degree. At class level, increases in abundance and dominance of forest and crop landscapes would reduce drought risk, while it was opposite for grass landscape. Improved forest connectedness would optimize dry-wet environment and reduce drought risk. The PLAND of forest and crop landscapes contributed the most prominent effect to alleviate drought intensity. Compared with forestland and grassland, determining suitable crop landscape configuration to reduce drought risk is more complex because the balance between agricultural economic benefits and ecological landscape effects should be taken into account.
More Related Videos
10:30Soil Lysimeter Excavation for Coupled Hydrological, Geochemical, and Microbiological Investigations
Published on: September 11, 2016
10:28Investigating the Relationship between Sea Surface Chlorophyll and Major Features of the South China Sea with Satellite Information
Published on: June 13, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Ecological Disturbance
Global Climate Change
Threats to Biodiversity
Ecological Succession
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Responses to Drought and Flooding