Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025
Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Removing a suprapatellar intramedullary nail via a suprapatellar approach: a retrospective cohort study
Ke Lu1, Hong-Zhen Wang1, Rong-Xun Qian1
1Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, Suzhou, 215300, Jiangsu, China.
Background:
Over the last 20 years, suprapatellar (SP) intramedullary nailing has gained considerable attention for treating tibia fractures and is believed to improve fracture alignments, decrease anterior knee pain, and facilitate intraoperative fluoroscopy. However, it is associated with various concerns, including the need to make another infrapatellar (IP) incision to remove the nail.
Aims:
This study was aimed at developing a new technique for the removal of SP tibial nails through an SP approach using a cannulated extraction system. The efficiency of the novel SP approach was compared to that of the traditional IP approach for the removal of SP tibial nails.
Patients And Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively collected clinical registry. The data for 69 consecutive patients who received surgery to remove a previous SP intramedullary nail using an SP approach (n = 30, SP cohort) or an IP approach (n = 39, IP cohort) were analyzed. Intra-operative evaluations included intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and changes in the surgical procedures. At six months follow-up, post-operative Lysholm knee score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and the active range of motion (ROM) of the affected knee and complications were assessed.
Results:
Patients in the SP cohort exhibited an increased post-operative Lysholm knee score (β, 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6 to 4.6; P = 0.012), decreased post-operative VAS score (β, - 0.7; 95% CI, - 1.1 to - 0.2; P = 0.004), and increased operation time (β, 9.8 minutes; 95% CI, 5.7 to 14.0 minutes; P < 0.001) compared with those treated with the IP approach after adjustment for baseline characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences in blood loss, post-operative ROM, or complications between the two cohorts.
Conclusions:
Compared with the IP technique, the SP approach for the removal of an SP tibial nail was independently associated with an increased post-operative Lysholm knee score and decreased VAS score, although the surgery was longer in duration. The novel technique offers a reliable and minimally invasive option for the removal of an SP tibial nail.
