Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kubler Ross's Stages of Dying01:21

Kubler Ross's Stages of Dying

422
Elisabeth Kübler-Ross significantly advanced psychology's understanding of the process of dying with her influential book, On Death and Dying (1969). She focused on studying terminally ill individuals and outlined five stages commonly experienced when coping with death: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.
In denial, individuals reject the reality of their condition, often thinking, "This isn't true; I feel fine," as a way to protect themselves from...
422

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bonobos track but might not represent ignorance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2025
Same author

Death is common, so is understanding it: the concept of death in other species.

Synthese·2021
Same author

Animal Morality: What It Means and Why It Matters.

The journal of ethics·2019
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Digital Planimetry for Assessing Wound Closure Kinetics in a Mouse Model
07:56

Digital Planimetry for Assessing Wound Closure Kinetics in a Mouse Model

Published on: January 10, 2025

790

How to Tell If Animals Can Understand Death.

Susana Monsó1

  • 1Unit of Ethics and Human-Animal Studies, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Erkenntnis
|February 7, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores how to empirically determine if animals possess a concept of death. It proposes minimal conditions for understanding death, focusing on non-functionality and irreversibility, challenging the human-centric view.

More Related Videos

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
10:34

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Published on: August 30, 2020

10.8K
The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle
12:08

The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle

Published on: April 22, 2020

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Digital Planimetry for Assessing Wound Closure Kinetics in a Mouse Model
07:56

Digital Planimetry for Assessing Wound Closure Kinetics in a Mouse Model

Published on: January 10, 2025

790
Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
10:34

Double Direct Injection of Blood into the Cisterna Magna as a Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Published on: August 30, 2020

10.8K
The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle
12:08

The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle

Published on: April 22, 2020

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Ethology
  • Animal Cognition
  • Philosophy of Mind

Background:

  • The prevailing assumption is that only humans possess a concept of death.
  • The prevalence of death in nature suggests potential evolutionary advantages for understanding it in animals.
  • Existing research lacks empirical frameworks for assessing animal comprehension of death.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a methodology for empirically investigating whether non-human animals can possess a concept of death.
  • To define the minimal cognitive conditions required for a concept of death.
  • To challenge the binary and universal interpretations of the concept of death.

Main Methods:

  • Developing an account of concept possession favoring intensional classification.
  • Defining the concept of death as non-binary and non-universal.
  • Proposing a set of minimal conditions for understanding death: expectation of life, recognition of non-functionality, and irreversibility.
  • Outlining necessary observational and experimental evidence.

Main Results:

  • The study does not present empirical results but rather a theoretical framework and methodological proposal.
  • It argues that a minimal understanding of death involves expecting a dead individual to be alive, then grasping its non-functionality and irreversibility.
  • The proposed framework allows for empirical testing of animal cognition regarding death.

Conclusions:

  • Assessing animal concepts of death requires moving beyond simple discrimination to deeper cognitive understanding.
  • A minimal concept of death involves recognizing its non-functional and irreversible nature.
  • Further empirical research is needed to determine the extent of animal comprehension of death based on the proposed criteria.