Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

08:34
Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
20.5K
Onboard cone-beam CT-based replan evaluation for head and neck proton therapy
Alexander Stanforth1, Liyong Lin1, Jonathan J Beitler1
1Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|February 7, 2022
Summary
Deforming the treatment planning CT (TPCT) to the pretreatment CBCT improves replan evaluation in proton therapy. This method offers higher specificity than current quality assurance CT (QACT) for head and neck cancer patients.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Image-Guided Therapy
Background:
- Quality assurance computed tomography (QACT) is standard for evaluating replan needs in proton therapy.
- QACT may inaccurately suggest replanning due to setup errors, not anatomical changes.
- Deforming the treatment planning CT (TPCT) to pretreatment CBCT (TPCTdir) may mitigate this issue.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the performance of replan evaluation using deformed TPCT (TPCTdir) in proton head and neck (H&N) therapy.
- To compare the specificity of TPCTdir-based replan evaluation against traditional QACT.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-eight H&N datasets with pretreatment CBCT and QACT were analyzed.
- Dosimetric parameters (ΔD95, ΔDmean, ΔD1) for clinical target volumes (CTVs) were calculated on TPCTdir, deformed QACT (QACTdir), and QACT.
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate replan triggers based on ΔD95, using QACTdir as the reference.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in body contour changes were observed between no-replan (95.8 ± 83.8 cc) and replan (305.0 ± 235.0 cc) groups (p < 0.01).
- Dosimetric parameter changes were comparable across evaluations (TPCTdir, QACTdir, QACT).
- A threshold of CTV ΔD95 > 2.6% in TPCTdir yielded a specificity of 98%, outperforming QACT's 94% specificity.
Conclusions:
- Replan evaluation based on TPCTdir demonstrates superior specificity compared to QACT.
- The proposed TPCTdir method effectively distinguishes between setup errors and true anatomical changes requiring replanning.

