Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2025

A Method for Targeted 16S Sequencing of Human Milk Samples
09:09

A Method for Targeted 16S Sequencing of Human Milk Samples

Published on: March 23, 2018

10.0K

Evaluating supervised and unsupervised background noise correction in human gut microbiome data.

Leah Briscoe1, Brunilda Balliu2, Sriram Sankararaman3,4,2

  • 1Bioinformatics Interdepartmental Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

Plos Computational Biology
|February 7, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Select microbial metabolites promote tau aggregation in a murine tauopathy model.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Complex adaptive architectures constrain the pace of adaptations sweeping across human gut microbiomes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Uniform bacterial genetic diversity along the gut.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Choice of phenotype scale is critical in biobank-based G×E tests.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Gene-specific selective sweeps are pervasive across human gut microbiomes.

Nature·2025
Same journal

Development of whole-limb skeletal patterning through the coordination of growth and self-organization models.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

The energetic cost of human standing balance and gait initiation over a range of natural postures.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Combinatorial multiomic analysis from a pedigree of Sox10Dom Hirschsprung mice identifies multiple high confidence candidate modifiers of Enteric Nervous System development.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Extracting host-specific developmental signatures from longitudinal microbiome data.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Population sparseness determines strength of Hebbian plasticity for maximal memory lifetime in associative networks.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Predictive coding explains asymmetric connectivity in the brain: A neural network study.

PLoS computational biology·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

Identifying biomarkers from microbiome data is challenging due to technical noise. An unsupervised principal component correction method shows promise for reducing false biomarker discoveries without prior knowledge of variation sources.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiome research
  • Computational biology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Predicting human phenotypes and identifying disease biomarkers from metagenomic data is vital for developing microbiome-associated therapeutics.
  • Technical variables (e.g., sequencing protocols) in metagenomic data introduce noise, complicating phenotype prediction and biomarker discovery.
  • Existing supervised noise correction methods, adapted from gene expression data, may fail to account for unmeasured variation sources in microbiome data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of different denoising transformations and correction methods for metagenomic data.
  • To evaluate an unsupervised principal component correction approach for microbiome data analysis.
  • To assess the impact of noise correction on phenotype prediction and biomarker discovery.

More Related Videos

A Method to Assess Bacteriocin Effects on the Gut Microbiota of Mice
07:54

A Method to Assess Bacteriocin Effects on the Gut Microbiota of Mice

Published on: July 25, 2017

14.4K
Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing
07:21

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: August 25, 2018

13.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 4, 2025

A Method for Targeted 16S Sequencing of Human Milk Samples
09:09

A Method for Targeted 16S Sequencing of Human Milk Samples

Published on: March 23, 2018

10.0K
A Method to Assess Bacteriocin Effects on the Gut Microbiota of Mice
07:54

A Method to Assess Bacteriocin Effects on the Gut Microbiota of Mice

Published on: July 25, 2017

14.4K
Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing
07:21

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: August 25, 2018

13.0K

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of supervised denoising transformations combined with correction methods.
  • Application and evaluation of an unsupervised principal component correction approach on microbiome data.
  • Assessment of biomarker discovery and phenotype prediction accuracy before and after noise correction.

Main Results:

  • The unsupervised principal component correction approach demonstrated comparable efficacy to supervised methods in reducing false biomarker discoveries.
  • This unsupervised method offers the advantage of not requiring prior knowledge of variation sources.
  • In prediction tasks, the unsupervised approach improved performance only when technical variables constituted the majority of the data variance.

Conclusions:

  • Unsupervised principal component correction is a viable strategy for reducing false discoveries in microbiome biomarker analysis.
  • This method enhances reproducibility in microbiome analyses, especially with increasing dataset sizes.
  • Further research is needed to optimize unsupervised approaches for diverse microbiome data characteristics and prediction tasks.