Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biologic and nonbiologic materials in otologic surgery.

G H Epstein, R T Sataloff

    Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
    |February 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Open access: Is there a predator at the door?

    Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2017
    Same author

    The First Experience of Computer-Assisted Image Guidance in Laparoscopic Surgery: The Targeting Animation Guidance (TAG) System.

    Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2016
    Same author

    The superior laryngeal nerve injury of a famous soprano, Amelita Galli-Curci.

    Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale·2013
    Same author

    Antibodies to HSP-70 in normal donors and autoimmune hearing loss patients.

    The Laryngoscope·2003
    Same author

    Laryngeal myasthenia gravis: report of 40 cases.

    Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation·2002
    Same author

    Autoimmune inner ear disease: steroid and cytotoxic drug therapy.

    Ear, nose, & throat journal·2002

    The review highlights that while various materials exist for middle ear implants, each has pros and cons. Currently, no single material is considered ideal for middle ear surgery.

    Area of Science:

    • Biomaterials Science
    • Otolaryngology
    • Surgical Innovation

    Background:

    • Middle ear surgery frequently requires the use of implants to restore hearing and middle ear function.
    • A wide array of materials, including synthetic polymers, ceramics, and biological tissues, have been employed for these implants.
    • The selection of an appropriate implant material is critical for surgical success and long-term patient outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To conduct a comprehensive review of materials utilized in middle ear reconstructive surgery.
    • To critically evaluate the advantages and disadvantages associated with each material type.
    • To identify current limitations and future directions in the development of middle ear implants.

    Main Methods:

    • Systematic literature search of databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus) for studies on middle ear implant materials.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Categorization of materials based on their composition and properties.
  • Analysis of reported clinical outcomes, biocompatibility, and mechanical characteristics.

    • Main Results:

    • Various materials, such as hydroxyapatite, titanium, silicone, and cartilage, demonstrate specific benefits and drawbacks.
    • Biocompatibility, ease of handling, and long-term stability vary significantly among different implant substances.
    • No single material has emerged as universally superior, with limitations reported for all currently available options.

    Conclusions:

    • The current landscape of middle ear implant materials presents a trade-off between advantages and disadvantages.
    • The pursuit of an ideal implant material with optimal biocompatibility, mechanical integrity, and functional restoration remains ongoing.
    • Future research should focus on developing novel biomaterials or refining existing ones to overcome current limitations in middle ear reconstructive surgery.