Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

A Doxorubicin-Induced Murine Model of Dilated Cardiomyopathy In Vivo
Published on: May 16, 2020
Prognostic differences in long-standing vs. recent-onset dilated cardiomyopathy
Jonas Silverdal1, Helen Sjöland1, Aldina Pivodic2
1Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Insights
Patients with long-standing heart failure (HF) due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) face worse outcomes than those with recent-onset HF. Comorbidities significantly impact prognosis, underscoring the need for comprehensive management in DCM patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
- Clinical Outcomes
Background:
- Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a significant cause of heart failure (HF).
- Understanding prognostic factors in recent-onset versus long-standing HF in DCM is crucial for patient management.
- The Swedish Heart Failure Registry provides a robust dataset for such investigations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes between patients with recent-onset dilated cardiomyopathy heart failure (RODCM) and long-standing dilated cardiomyopathy heart failure (LDCM).
- To identify prognostic factors associated with adverse outcomes in DCM patients with varying HF durations.
Main Methods:
- A comparative analysis of 2019 RODCM patients and 1714 LDCM patients from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (2003-2016).
- Outcome measures included all-cause, cardiovascular (CV), and non-CV death, hospitalizations, heart transplantation, and a composite endpoint.
- Multivariable risk factor and propensity score-matched analyses were employed to assess prognostic factors.
Main Results:
- Longer disease duration (LDCM) was associated with significantly higher rates of all-cause death, CV death, heart transplantation, HF hospitalization, and a combined adverse outcome compared to RODCM.
- Cardiovascular death was the primary cause of mortality in LDCM.
- Comorbidities were more frequent in LDCM and increased with disease duration; diabetes was a consistent adverse factor in both groups. Male sex and aspirin use were risk factors only in RODCM, while higher heart rate, atrial fibrillation, connective tissue disorders, and diuretic use were adverse only in LDCM.
Conclusions:
- Longer disease duration in DCM is a significant predictor of worse prognosis.
- The increased prevalence and impact of comorbidities in LDCM highlight their importance in overall patient outcomes.
- Effective management of comorbidities is essential for improving survival and quality of life in DCM patients, especially those with long-standing heart failure.
Aims:
This study aimed to evaluate the outcome and prognostic factors in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and long-standing heart failure (LDCM) vs. recent-onset heart failure (RODCM).
Methods And Results:
We compared 2019 patients with RODCM (duration <6 months, mean age 58.6 years, 70.7% male) with 1714 patients with LDCM (duration ≥6 months, median duration 3.5 years, mean age 62.5 years, 73.7% male) included in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry in the years 2003-16. Outcome measures were all-cause, cardiovascular (CV), and non-CV death and hospitalizations; heart transplantation; and a combined outcome of all-cause death, heart transplantation, or heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Multivariable risk factor analyses were performed for the combined endpoint. All outcomes were more frequent in LDCM than in RODCM. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval) for LDCM vs. RODCM were 1.56 (1.34-1.82), P < 0.0001, for all-cause death over a median follow-up of 4.2 and 5.0 years, respectively; 1.67 (1.36-2.05), P < 0.0001, for CV death; 2.12 (1.14-3.91), P < 0.0001, for heart transplantation; 1.36 (1.21-1.53), P < 0.0001, for HF hospitalization; and 1.37 (1.24-1.52), P < 0.0001, for the combined outcome. A propensity score-matched analysis yielded similar results. CV death was the main cause of mortality in LDCM and was higher in LDCM than in RODCM (P < 0.0001). Almost all co-morbidities were significantly more frequent in LDCM than in RODCM, and the mean number of co-morbidities increased significantly with increased duration of disease, also after age adjustment. Age, New York Heart Association functional class, ejection fraction, and left bundle branch block were prognostically adverse. The only co-morbidity associated with the combined outcome regardless of HF duration was diabetes, in LDCM [HR 1.34 (1.15-1.56), P = 0.0002] and in RODCM [HR 1.29 (1.04-1.59), P = 0.018]. Male sex [HR 1.38 (1.18-1.63), P < 0.0001] and aspirin use [HR 1.33 (1.14-1.55), P = 0.0004] carried increased risk only in RODCM. Heart rate ≥75 b.p.m. [HR 1.20 (1.04-1.37), P = 0.01], atrial fibrillation [HR 1.24 (1.08-1.42), P = 0.0024], musculoskeletal or connective tissue disorder [HR 1.36 (1.13-1.63), P = 0.0014], and diuretic therapy [HR 1.40 (1.17-1.67), P = 0.0002] were prognostically adverse only in LDCM.
Conclusions:
This nationwide study of patients with DCM demonstrates that longer disease duration is associated with worse prognosis. Co-morbidities are more common in long-standing HF than in recent-onset HF and are associated with worse outcome. With the increased survival seen in the last decades, our results highlight the importance of careful attention to co-morbid conditions in patients with DCM.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
08:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
Published on: August 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation