Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

531
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
531
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation01:22

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation

681
The instrumentation of atomic emission spectrometry (AES) involves various components, including atomization devices that convert samples into gas-phase atoms and ions. There are two main types of atomization devices: continuous and discrete atomizers.  Continuous atomizers, like plasmas and flames, introduce samples in a constant stream, while discrete atomizers inject individual samples using syringes or autosamplers. The most common discrete atomizer is the electrothermal atomizer.
681

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proof-of-concept of host attribution of antimicrobial resistance genes using wastewater Hi-C metagenome sequencing.

Journal of water and healthĀ·2026
Same author

Wastewater SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Hospital Admission and Mortality - A Controlled Experimental Study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciencesĀ·2026
Same author

SARS-CoV-2 wastewater genomic surveillance: approaches, challenges, and opportunities.

Genome biologyĀ·2026
Same author

A Componential Evaluation of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Streams.

Environmental science & technologyĀ·2025
Same author

Control of freshwater flows can counteract the effects of global climate change on salinity within urban estuaries.

The Science of the total environmentĀ·2025
Same author

Leveraging wastewater sequencing to strengthen global public health surveillance.

BMC global and public healthĀ·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Use of Capillary Aerosol Generator in Continuous Production of Controlled Aerosol for Non-Clinical Studies
08:33

Use of Capillary Aerosol Generator in Continuous Production of Controlled Aerosol for Non-Clinical Studies

Published on: April 12, 2022

3.7K

Sampling method comparison of enterococci aerosolization during continuous bubble bursting generation.

Peter J Sahwell1, Afeefa Abdool-Ghany1, James Klaus2

  • 1Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA.

FEMS Microbiology Letters
|February 9, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Aerosol filters effectively capture viable fecal bacteria transferred from water to air, outperforming impactors in recovery. Both methods showed similar variability in collecting these environmental aerosols.

Keywords:
aerosolbioaerosolenterococcifiltrationimpactionpathogen

More Related Videos

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
05:45

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions

Published on: January 7, 2019

11.4K
Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
09:30

Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Published on: March 17, 2023

3.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Use of Capillary Aerosol Generator in Continuous Production of Controlled Aerosol for Non-Clinical Studies
08:33

Use of Capillary Aerosol Generator in Continuous Production of Controlled Aerosol for Non-Clinical Studies

Published on: April 12, 2022

3.7K
Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
05:45

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions

Published on: January 7, 2019

11.4K
Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
09:30

Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Published on: March 17, 2023

3.7K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental microbiology
  • Aerosol science
  • Water quality monitoring

Background:

  • Fecal indicator bacteria, such as enterococci, can transfer from water to air.
  • Understanding this water-to-air transfer is crucial for assessing environmental health risks, especially in areas with contaminated recreational waters.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the water-to-air transfer of viable enterococci.
  • To compare the capture efficiency of an impactor versus an aerosol filter for collecting these bacteria.

Main Methods:

  • A simulated air-sea interface was used to aerosolize enterococci.
  • Viable enterococci were collected using both an impactor and an aerosol filter.
  • Bacterial concentrations were quantified as colony-forming units (CFU)/L.

Main Results:

  • The aerosol filter captured significantly more viable enterococci (171.2 CFU/L) than the impactor (70.1 CFU/L).
  • Both methods yielded comparable variability, with coefficients of variation of 14% for the filter and 13% for the impactor.
  • The study confirmed viable enterococci transfer across the air-sea interface.

Conclusions:

  • Aerosol filters demonstrate superior performance for collecting viable, aerosolized enterococci compared to impactors.
  • Both methods are suitable for capturing viable bacteria, but filters offer higher recovery rates.
  • Findings are relevant for monitoring environmental aerosols from contaminated water sources.