Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

237
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
237
Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

468
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
468
Forgetting01:21

Forgetting

144
Forgetting is an intrinsic aspect of human memory, characterized by the gradual loss or inaccessibility of information over time. Hermann Ebbinghaus, a pioneering psychologist, extensively studied this phenomenon and formulated the forgetting curve. This curve illustrates that memory loss occurs rapidly immediately after learning and then decelerates over time. Several mechanisms contribute to forgetting, including encoding failure, storage decay, retrieval failure, and interference.
Encoding...
144
Impact of Schemas01:30

Impact of Schemas

20
Schemas are cognitive structures that provide a framework for interpreting and organizing social information. They help individuals navigate complex environments by offering expectations about people, events, and behaviors. Schemas influence attention, encoding, and retrieval processes, thereby shaping the entire trajectory of information processing in social contexts.Attention and Cognitive LoadDuring initial attention, schemas function as filters that prioritize schema-consistent information,...
20

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Slowing forgetting in visual working memory: Proactive facilitation in the repeated-unique paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Familiarity influences on proactive interference in verbal memory.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Rapid but incomplete degradation of residual visual representations over time.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.7K

Magnitude and sources of proactive interference in visual memory.

Tom Mercer1, Luke P Fisher2

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.

Memory (Hove, England)
|February 10, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Proactive interference disrupts new learning in visual working memory, even across multiple trials. This memory effect occurs with stimuli closely resembling old targets, not just exact matches.

Keywords:
Proactive interferenceforgettingrecent probes taskvisual working memory

More Related Videos

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

14.8K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 4, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.7K
Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

14.8K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Proactive interference, where old memories impede new learning, is a known forgetting mechanism.
  • Its precise role and triggers in visual working memory remain unclear.
  • Previous research lacks consensus on the specific informational features causing this interference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of proactive interference on visual working memory.
  • To identify the specific types of visual information that elicit proactive interference.
  • To determine the duration and characteristics of proactive interference in visual working memory.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a modified recent probes task across three experiments.
  • Participants encoded multiple target images per trial and identified matching probes.
  • Manipulated probe similarity to previously encoded targets in terms of exact match, state, color, and category.

Main Results:

  • Proactive interference was observed and persisted across multiple trials (N-1, N-3).
  • Probes with similar state information to prior targets significantly hindered performance.
  • Probes differing only in color or general category elicited minimal proactive interference.

Conclusions:

  • Demonstrated robust proactive interference within visual working memory.
  • Found that stimuli closely resembling previously encoded targets, not just exact matches, can cause interference.
  • Challenged the assumption that proactive interference requires an exact memory representation.