Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.3K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.3K
Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

12.7K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
12.7K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

29.1K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
29.1K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

16.1K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.1K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

287
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
287
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Medical trainees' emotions and their effects on perceptions of performance and team mood in team-based simulations.

The British journal of educational psychology·2025
Same author

LPS Increases Artery but Not Airway Contraction in Precision-Cut Lung Slices from a Mouse Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology·2024
Same author

Want to try a registered report? Here are our lessons learned.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2024
Same author

Author Correction: r2mlm: An R package calculating R-squared measures for multilevel models.

Behavior research methods·2024
Same author

TLR9 Monotherapy in Immune-Competent Mice Suppresses Orthotopic Prostate Tumor Development.

Cells·2024
Same author

Glycolysis and the Pentose Phosphate Pathway Promote LPS-Induced NOX2 Oxidase- and IFN-β-Dependent Inflammation in Macrophages.

Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

Addressing a crisis of generalizability with large-scale construct validation.

Jessica Kay Flake1, Raymond Luong1, Mairead Shaw1

  • 1Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QCH3A 1G1, Canada. Jessica.flake@mcgill.ca; raymond.luong@mail.mcgill.ca; mairead.shaw@mail.mcgill.ca; https://www.mcgill.ca/psychology/jessica-kay-flake; https://www.mcgill.ca/psychology/jessica-kay-flake.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|February 10, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Many studies lack utility due to model issues. Large-scale replications can assess construct generalizability, addressing this crisis through construct validation.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Psychological science
  • Social sciences
  • Behavioral research

Background:

  • Many research studies yield limited utility because of model misspecification and operationalization specificity.
  • This leads to a generalizability crisis, where findings may not apply broadly.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a methodological approach to enhance the utility and generalizability of research findings.
  • To advocate for large-scale replications as a tool for construct validation.

Main Methods:

  • Retooling large-scale replications to focus on descriptive research.
  • Conducting systematic assessments of construct generalizability across diverse contexts.

Main Results:

  • Large-scale construct validation is demonstrated as a feasible and necessary endeavor.
  • This approach directly addresses the limitations stemming from model misspecification.

Conclusions:

  • Adopting large-scale construct validation is crucial for overcoming the generalizability crisis in research.
  • This methodological shift will improve the reliability and applicability of scientific claims.