Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

14:43
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
12.1K
We need to think more about how we conduct research
1Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin Lentzeallee 94, 14195Berlin, Germany. gigerenzer@mpib-berlin.mpg.de.
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|February 10, 2022
Summary
Research often relies on routine sampling of subjects, not stimuli, leading to flawed generalizations. This practice, driven by administrative needs, overlooks scientific rigor and promotes a replicability delusion.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Research Methodology
Background:
- Research practices are frequently dictated by routine rather than critical reflection.
- The common practice of sampling subjects but not stimuli can lead to unwarranted generalizations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the issue of routine-based research practices.
- To examine the consequences of sampling only subjects and not stimuli.
- To critique the overreliance on statistical significance and the replicability delusion.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of common research practices in subject sampling.
- Critique of the origins and reinforcement of current methodologies.
- Examination of the concept of the replicability delusion.
Main Results:
- The routine of sampling subjects, not stimuli, likely stems from administrative rather than scientific concerns.
- Generalizations drawn from subject-only sampling are often unwarranted.
- The meaningfulness of statistical significance is often overestimated, contributing to the replicability delusion.
Conclusions:
- Researchers should move beyond routine practices and engage in critical reflection.
- A more rigorous approach to stimulus sampling is needed to avoid flawed generalizations.
- Challenging the replicability delusion is crucial for advancing scientific understanding.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
24.7K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.7K
Archival Research
16.6K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
16.6K
Surveys
16.1K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.1K
Naturalistic Observations
16.5K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
16.5K
Psychology as a Science
2.6K
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
2.6K
The Scientific Method
63.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
63.3K

