Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Dual-Plating in Distal Femur Fracture: A Systematic Review and Limited Meta-analysis
Sujit Kumar Tripathy1, Narayan Prasad Mishra1, Paulson Varghese1
1Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019 India.
Dual plating offers satisfactory union for distal femur fractures, with faster healing but longer surgery. Functional outcomes and complications are similar to single plating, despite higher nonunion rates in some dual-plate cases.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Traumatology
- Biomechanical engineering
Background:
- Distal femur fractures, especially comminuted metaphyseal and articular types, present challenges with high rates of varus collapse and implant failure using standard lateral locking plates.
- Dual plating has emerged as a potential alternative for managing these complex fractures, aiming to improve stability and reduce complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and evaluate the functional outcomes and complication rates associated with dual plating versus single plating for distal femur fractures.
- To compare the efficacy and safety of dual plating techniques in managing comminuted distal femur fractures.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across major databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials).
- 12 studies, including one randomized-controlled trial, four prospective, and seven retrospective studies, involving 292 knees (213 dual plating, 76 single plating), were included in the analysis.
- Outcomes assessed included union rates, healing time, functional scores (VAS, Neer, Kolmert), surgical duration, and blood loss.
Main Results:
- Dual plating demonstrated faster fracture healing (mean difference 5.43 weeks, p=0.0002) but involved a longer surgical duration (mean difference -16.84 minutes, p=0.0001).
- Nonunion and delayed union rates for dual plating were up to 12.5% and 33.3%, respectively; pooled analysis showed no significant difference in nonunion rates compared to single plating (9.2% vs. 0%, p=0.13).
- Functional outcomes (VAS, Neer, Kolmert scores) and complication rates, including blood loss, showed no significant difference between single and dual plating techniques.
Conclusions:
- Dual plating provides satisfactory union for comminuted metaphyseal and articular distal femur fractures.
- While dual fixation accelerates fracture healing, it increases surgical time without significantly improving functional outcomes or reducing complications compared to single plating.
- The choice between single and dual plating should consider the trade-off between faster healing and increased surgical complexity.
More Related Videos
15:11Surgical Fixation of Sternal Fractures: Preoperative Planning and a Safe Surgical Technique Using Locked Titanium Plates and Depth Limited Drilling
Published on: January 5, 2015
08:04Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis
Published on: March 11, 2017