Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

11:38
Influence of Hybrid Perovskite Fabrication Methods on Film Formation, Electronic Structure, and Solar Cell Performance
Published on: February 27, 2017
18.7K
Costing Analysis of Scalable Carbon-Based Perovskite Modules Using Bottom Up Technique
Priyanka Kajal1, Bhupesh Verma2, Satya Gangadhara Rao Vadaga3
1School of Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Mandi Mandi Himachal Pradesh 175005 India.
Global Challenges (Hoboken, NJ)
|February 10, 2022
Summary
Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) offer a cost-effective alternative to silicon PV, with technoeconomic analysis showing competitive pricing. This research analyzes the manufacturing costs and energy prices for perovskite solar modules in India.
Area of Science:
- Photovoltaic technology
- Renewable energy
- Materials science
Background:
- Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) demonstrate high power conversion efficiency (25.5%), positioning them as a viable alternative to silicon (Si) photovoltaic (PV) technology.
- PSCs offer potential for low investment and reduced CO2 emissions, attracting significant market interest.
- Technoeconomic analysis is crucial for assessing manufacturing costs and market viability of emerging PV technologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a technoeconomic analysis of a 100 MW carbon-based perovskite solar module (CPSM) factory in India.
- To determine the minimum sustainable prices (MSPs) and levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for two different CPSM architectures.
- To compare the economic feasibility of CPSMs with established crystalline silicon solar modules.
Main Methods:
- Technoeconomic analysis of a 100 MW CPSM factory.
- Calculation of MSPs for high-temperature (Module A) and low-temperature (Module B) processed CPSMs.
- Calculation of LCOE based on MSPs and module lifetime (10 and 25 years).
Main Results:
- Module A (high-temperature) has an MSP of $0.21 W⁻¹ and Module B (low-temperature) has an MSP of $0.15 W⁻¹.
- For a 10-year lifespan, LCOEs are 3.40 ¢ kWh⁻¹ (Module A) and 3.02 ¢ kWh⁻¹ (Module B).
- For a 25-year lifespan, LCOEs decrease to 1.66 ¢ kWh⁻¹ (Module A) and 1.47 ¢ kWh⁻¹ (Module B).
Conclusions:
- The calculated LCOEs for CPSMs are comparable to market-dominant crystalline silicon solar modules.
- Perovskite solar cell technology presents a favorable economic outlook for widespread adoption.
- The technoeconomic analysis supports the market potential of CPSMs, particularly the low-temperature processed modules.

