Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2025

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
Published on: March 19, 2020
Balance on different unstable supports: a complementary approach based on linear and non-linear analyses
John McCamley1,2, Elena Bergamini3, Eleni Grimpampi4
1Human Motion Laboratory, MORE Foundation, 18444 N 25th Ave., Suite 110, Phoenix, AZ, 85023, USA.
Balance training on unstable surfaces improves postural control. This study found that while unstable surfaces differ from stable ones, the specific type of unstable surface does not alter the body's center of pressure control strategy.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Motor Control
- Human Movement Science
Background:
- Postural control is vital for daily activities and relies on sensory-motor integration.
- Balance training using unstable surfaces is common, but optimal surface selection remains unclear.
- Non-linear dynamical systems analysis offers novel insights into postural control strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of different unstable supports on center of pressure (CoP) trajectory during single-leg balance.
- To compare linear and non-linear analysis techniques in evaluating postural control strategies on various surfaces.
- To determine if different balance training devices influence CoP dynamics.
Main Methods:
- Seventeen healthy adults performed single-leg balance trials on a force plate and three unstable surfaces (soft disc, foam pad, pillow).
- Center of pressure (CoP) trajectories were analyzed using classical stabilometry (sway path, velocity, RMS) and Recurrent Quantification Analysis (RQA).
- RQA parameters included percent recurrence, determinism, maximum line length, and entropy.
Main Results:
- Both classical and RQA analyses revealed significant differences between stable (force plate) and unstable conditions.
- Classical stabilometric parameters showed significant differences among the unstable surfaces.
- RQA analysis indicated that the dynamic/temporal structure of the CoP trajectory was not significantly influenced by the type of unstable surface.
Conclusions:
- Unstable surfaces significantly alter postural control strategies compared to stable surfaces.
- While different unstable surfaces elicit varied responses in classical stabilometric measures, they do not fundamentally change the underlying dynamic control strategy of the CoP trajectory.
- Non-linear analysis (RQA) provides a deeper understanding of the temporal dynamics of postural control, suggesting robustness across different unstable training devices.
Related Concept Videos
Stability of structures
Constraints and Statical Determinacy
Support Reactions
The purpose of the supports is to prevent the translational motion of the system by applying an equal and opposite force and to prevent the system's rotation by applying...
Beams with Unsymmetric Loadings
The first moment-area theorem determines the slope at any point on the beam. This theorem indicates that the change in slope between two points on a beam...
Applications of Stress
The...
Indeterminate Structure

